Recognition Physics φ · Mass Ratio

The muon-to-electron ratio, certified with integers only.

CODATA measures mμ/me = 206.7682827(46). Recognition Science places that ratio between rungs 11 and 12 of the golden ladder: φ¹¹ = 199.005 and φ¹² = 321.997. The Lean module MassRatioBinding certifies the placement, the uniqueness of the nearest rung, and a deviation bracket, all by decide on exact golden-integer arithmetic. This script is an independent witness of the same six inequalities, run on a tighter CODATA sub-interval (about ±1σ) that sits inside Lean's ±10σ window: integer sign tests on numbers like φ⁹⁷⁵ vs R88, no floating point anywhere in the verdict path. Six gates, all PASS.

mass_ratio_exact.py · independent witness of DeltaSpine/MassRatioBinding.lean · run verified 2026-07-08

6 / 6PASS gates
rung 11nearest, proved unique
ε ≈ 0.0795bracketed to 10⁻⁷
stdlibexact fractions · <1s
The six gates, plainly

Window, uniqueness, bracket

Window (2 gates): the measured ratio sits strictly between φ¹¹ and φ¹². Uniqueness (2 gates): squaring shows rung 11 is strictly nearer than rung 12, so the assignment cannot flip. Bracket (2 gates): the fractional position ε between the rungs satisfies 5/63 < ε < 7/88, pinning it to about one part in 10⁷.

The claim under test

Any FAIL kills the Lean chain

this script: R ∈ [206.7682780, 206.7682874] (~±1σ) Lean window: R ∈ [206.7682367, 206.7683287] (±10σ) φ¹¹ < R_lo < R_hi < φ¹² φ⁶⁹⁸ < R_lo⁶³, R_hi⁸⁸ < φ⁹⁷⁵

The script's interval is a strict sub-interval of Lean's, so a Lean PASS implies a script PASS on every gate. If this independent witness prints FAIL on any line, the corresponding Lean decide is wrong.

Also printed, diagnostic only

ε vs 1/(4π)

The certified bracket puts ε in [0.0795256, 0.0795257]. Nearby landmarks: 1/(4π) = 0.0795775 and 1/(4π) − α² = 0.0795242. Both sit outside the certified interval. The script prints them as orientation, not as claims.

Where the ratio sits, drawn

Top: position of R = 206.768 between φ¹¹ and φ¹² in ladder coordinates (ε = logφ(R/φ¹¹) = 0.0795). Bottom: zoom on ε showing the certified interval (gold) inside the proved rational bracket (5/63, 7/88), with 1/(4π) and 1/(4π)−α² outside it.

Run it yourself

$ python3 mass_ratio_exact.py
PASS  window_lower  phi^11 < R_lo
PASS  window_upper  R_hi < phi^12
PASS  nearest_lower phi^21 < R_lo^2
PASS  nearest_upper R_hi^2 < phi^23
PASS  eps_lower  phi^698 < R_lo^63
PASS  eps_upper  R_hi^88 < phi^975

eps in [0.079525603, 0.079525698]
1/(4pi)           = 0.079577472
1/(4pi) - alpha^2 = 0.079524220
↓ Exact-ratio script Reference output
Honest scope

Split tier, matching MassRatioBindingReal: the six integer gates (σ₀) are THEOREM, proved by decide in Lean; that the true ratio lies in the CODATA window (σ₁) is MEASURED, a hypothesis about the measurement, not a Lean proof. This script is an independent numeric witness of the same six inequalities on a tighter CODATA sub-interval ([206.7682780, 206.7682874], about ±1σ) inside Lean's ±10σ window ([206.7682367, 206.7683287]). What it does NOT do: derive why the muon sits near rung 11, or make the placement a prediction (the rung was identified from the measured value). What it does: certify, with exact integer arithmetic on both sides, that the CODATA interval sits inside the stated φ-window with a unique nearest rung and a 10⁻⁷-wide deviation bracket. A FAIL line would falsify the formalization, not the measured mass ratio. The ε-vs-1/(4π) comparison is diagnostic: the certified interval excludes both landmark values.

All labs Regge triangulation Bekenstein spectrometer Lattice Lorentz Six gravity numbers 3/8 crossing Mass ratio PMNS χ² Galaxy rotation Regge cubic Solar eigenvalues Erdős–Straus The α construction