Encyclopedia Thermodynamics Thermodynamics Heat Pump Cop Rs

ARTICLE 4 claims 4 theorems

Thermodynamics Heat Pump Cop Rs

A heat pump's efficiency is a ratio of heat moved to work supplied; Recognition Science models that ratio with its forced cost function.

The heat pump coefficient

A heat pump's coefficient of performance (COP) is the ratio of heat it delivers to the work you put in. A typical residential unit moves about three to four units of heat per unit of electricity, so its COP sits between 3 and 4. The number matters because it says how much heating you get for each watt you pay for; higher is better, and the theoretical ceiling comes from the temperatures involved, not from the machine's design.

In Recognition Science, the framework models the COP as a ratio of two quantities, recognition costs: the cost of recognizing a state m against a reference e, written as J(m/e). The framework's central cost function is J(x) = (x + 1/x)/2 - 1, which is proved to be the only function satisfying five plain conditions. That function vanishes when m equals e, and it is nonnegative for positive inputs, so the model's cost is zero when the two states match and grows as they diverge.

The golden ratio φ appears as the framework's natural operating point: φ² = 2.618, which lands in the typical COP range of 3 to 4. The framework also defines a threshold φ - 3/2, which is positive because φ exceeds 1.5. These are the framework's three proved facts: the cost is zero at equality, it is nonnegative for positive inputs, and the threshold is positive. The framework proves nothing specific to heat pumps, because its definition of m and e does not connect them to temperatures, pressures, or any physical heat-pump quantity.

What the framework establishes in plain language is a template, not a physical law. It shows that the cost function, applied to any ratio, has the minimal properties any sensible cost should have. The research note in the framework records the intended direction: that the COP at the golden-ratio operating point might match typical values. That note is a hypothesis, not a result; the framework itself does not define m and e in thermodynamic terms, so it cannot yet claim to derive a COP.

THEOREM domainCost_at_eq · IndisputableMonolith/Thermodynamics/Heat_Pump_COP_RS.lean
theorem domainCost_at_eq (r : ℝ) (h : r ≠ 0) : domainCost r r = 0 := by
  unfold domainCost; rw [div_self h]; exact Jcost_unit0
THEOREM domainCost_nonneg · IndisputableMonolith/Thermodynamics/Heat_Pump_COP_RS.lean
theorem domainCost_nonneg (m e : ℝ) (hm : 0 < m) (he : 0 < e) : 0 ≤ domainCost m e := by
  unfold domainCost; exact Jcost_nonneg (div_pos hm he)
THEOREM canonicalThreshold_pos · IndisputableMonolith/Thermodynamics/Heat_Pump_COP_RS.lean
theorem canonicalThreshold_pos : 0 < canonicalThreshold := by
  unfold canonicalThreshold; linarith [phi_gt_onePointFive]
THEOREM domainCost · IndisputableMonolith/Thermodynamics/Heat_Pump_COP_RS.lean
def domainCost (m e : ℝ) : ℝ := Jcost (m / e)

What this page does not claim

The framework derives the heat pump COP from thermodynamics. The golden-ratio COP value is a measured or proved physical result. The framework's cost function is specific to heat pumps.

Verify this page

Every tagged claim above names its theorem. To check one yourself rather than trust this page, elaborate the source module with Lean 4 and audit its axiom basis:

$ lake env lean IndisputableMonolith/Thermodynamics/Heat_Pump_COP_RS.lean
expected axiom basis: [propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound] (the Lean kernel's standard three; no RS-specific axioms)

A page whose claims cannot be reproduced this way does not ship. In production, every anchor links to the exact declaration in the public source release, and this block carries the build receipt for the page itself.

Derived articles

This page is generated by a question-recursion engine: the questions its answers raise become the next pages. The current agenda, with open targets marked red:

MACHINE LAYER · GROUNDED CLAIM TABLE · CLICK TO EXPAND