Encyclopedia Physics Physics Renormalization Group2 From Jcost
ARTICLE 4 claims 4 theorems
Physics Renormalization Group2 From Jcost
A machine-checked library proves three basic facts about a cost function that measures the gap between two scales, but the physical theory it was meant to support remains unwritten.
A cost function for scales
The renormalization group in physics studies how a theory's parameters change as you zoom in or out on a physical system. Near a phase transition, these flows settle onto special points called fixed points. In three dimensions, the classic pair is the Gaussian fixed point at high energy and the Wilson-Fisher fixed point at low energy, where the critical exponents eta and nu take their measured values.
In Recognition Science, the framework models this idea with a cost function. The function cost, a measure of the recognition effort between two quantities, is applied to the ratio of two scales m and e. The definition is domainCost(m, e) = Jcost(m / e), where Jcost is the framework's forced cost function. The library proves three general facts about this function: it is zero when the two scales are equal, it is never negative for positive scales, and a threshold value phi minus 3/2 is positive. These are properties of the cost function itself, not of any particular physical system.
The library's own documentation is explicit: it proves nothing specific to the renormalization group, because the cost function is defined without reference to a particular physical model. The document notes that the intended connection to Wilson-Fisher fixed points, with RS values of eta = 0.118 and nu = 0.618, remains a research note. The measured values are eta roughly 0.036 and nu roughly 0.630, so the framework's nu is within about two percent, while eta is described as structural.
What the library establishes in plain language is a small, rigorous foundation. It shows that the cost function behaves sensibly at the level of pure mathematics: equal scales cost nothing, and no positive scale ratio carries negative cost. This is a necessary condition for any physical interpretation, but it is not sufficient. The step that would turn this into a theorem about the renormalization group, defining m and e in the subject's own terms, is not present in this library.
THEOREM domainCost_at_eq · IndisputableMonolith/Physics/RenormalizationGroup2FromJCost.lean
theorem domainCost_at_eq (r : ℝ) (h : r ≠ 0) : domainCost r r = 0 := by
unfold domainCost; rw [div_self h]; exact Jcost_unit0
THEOREM domainCost_nonneg · IndisputableMonolith/Physics/RenormalizationGroup2FromJCost.lean
theorem domainCost_nonneg (m e : ℝ) (hm : 0 < m) (he : 0 < e) : 0 ≤ domainCost m e := by
unfold domainCost; exact Jcost_nonneg (div_pos hm he)
THEOREM canonicalThreshold_pos · IndisputableMonolith/Physics/RenormalizationGroup2FromJCost.lean
theorem canonicalThreshold_pos : 0 < canonicalThreshold := by
unfold canonicalThreshold; linarith [phi_gt_onePointFive]
THEOREM domainCost · IndisputableMonolith/Physics/RenormalizationGroup2FromJCost.lean
def domainCost (m e : ℝ) : ℝ := Jcost (m / e)
What this page does not claim
This library does not derive the Wilson-Fisher fixed point or its critical exponents. The framework's values for eta and nu are not proven by this library. The cost function's properties here are not specific to any physical system.
Verify this page
Every tagged claim above names its theorem. To check one yourself rather than trust this page, elaborate the source module with Lean 4 and audit its axiom basis:
$ lake env lean IndisputableMonolith/Physics/RenormalizationGroup2FromJCost.lean
expected axiom basis: [propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound] (the Lean kernel's standard three; no RS-specific axioms)
A page whose claims cannot be reproduced this way does not ship. In production, every anchor links to the exact declaration in the public source release, and this block carries the build receipt for the page itself.
Derived articles
This page is generated by a question-recursion engine: the questions its answers raise become the next pages. The current agenda, with open targets marked red:
- What definition of m and e in renormalization-group terms would make this library a theorem about the subject?
- How does the forced cost function Jcost relate to the standard renormalization-group flow equations?
- What physical interpretation, if any, follows from the positivity of the cost function for positive scale ratios?
- Can the framework derive the Wilson-Fisher fixed point's critical exponents from a defined physical model?
MACHINE LAYER · GROUNDED CLAIM TABLE · CLICK TO EXPAND
THEOREM domainCost_at_eq · IndisputableMonolith/Physics/RenormalizationGroup2FromJCost.lean
theorem domainCost_at_eq (r : ℝ) (h : r ≠ 0) : domainCost r r = 0 := by unfold domainCost; rw [div_self h]; exact Jcost_unit0The function domainCost(m, e) = Jcost(m / e) is zero when the two scales are equal. domainCost_at_eq · IndisputableMonolith/Physics/RenormalizationGroup2FromJCost.leanTHEOREM domainCost_nonneg · IndisputableMonolith/Physics/RenormalizationGroup2FromJCost.lean
theorem domainCost_nonneg (m e : ℝ) (hm : 0 < m) (he : 0 < e) : 0 ≤ domainCost m e := by unfold domainCost; exact Jcost_nonneg (div_pos hm he)The function domainCost(m, e) is never negative for positive scales. domainCost_nonneg · IndisputableMonolith/Physics/RenormalizationGroup2FromJCost.leanTHEOREM canonicalThreshold_pos · IndisputableMonolith/Physics/RenormalizationGroup2FromJCost.lean
theorem canonicalThreshold_pos : 0 < canonicalThreshold := by unfold canonicalThreshold; linarith [phi_gt_onePointFive]The threshold value phi minus 3/2 is positive. canonicalThreshold_pos · IndisputableMonolith/Physics/RenormalizationGroup2FromJCost.leanTHEOREM domainCost · IndisputableMonolith/Physics/RenormalizationGroup2FromJCost.lean
def domainCost (m e : ℝ) : ℝ := Jcost (m / e)The library proves nothing specific to the renormalization group, because the cost function is defined without reference to a particular physical model. domainCost · IndisputableMonolith/Physics/RenormalizationGroup2FromJCost.lean