Encyclopedia Physics Physics Quantum Tunneling From Jcost
ARTICLE 2 claims 2 theorems
Physics Quantum Tunneling From Jcost
Quantum tunneling is the particle's end run around a wall it cannot climb; the framework's cost function sorts its five regimes.
Tunneling and the cost of recognition
Quantum tunneling is the phenomenon in which a particle passes through a potential energy barrier that, according to classical physics, it does not have enough energy to surmount. The probability of transmission decays exponentially with the barrier's width and height, a result first quantified in the late 1920s by George Gamow and, independently, by Ronald Gurney and Edward Condon in their work on alpha decay. The standard formula for the transmission probability is T proportional to exp(-2κd), where d is the barrier width and κ is the decay constant of the wavefunction inside the barrier.
In the Recognition Science framework, this exponential factor is reinterpreted as a cost: a forced price that reality pays for each recognition event, a discrete record of a physical interaction. The framework's central theorem proves that any cost function satisfying five plain conditions must equal J(x) = (x + 1/x)/2 - 1. The tunneling amplitude is then the J-cost of the ratio between the particle's momentum and the barrier's height. When that ratio is small, the cost is large and the tunneling rate is suppressed; when the ratio approaches one, the cost falls toward zero and transmission becomes classically allowed.
Within the framework, the module QuantumTunnelingFromJCost establishes that the full range of tunneling behavior splits into exactly five regimes: classically forbidden, thermally assisted, direct tunneling, resonant, and over-barrier. This fivefold classification is a proved theorem, not a modeling choice, and it derives from the same cost function that forces other physical constants. The transition from quantum suppression to classically allowed transmission occurs when the J-cost of the momentum-to-barrier ratio crosses a canonical band around J(φ), where φ is the golden ratio, a band that lies between roughly 0.11 and 0.13.
What this means in practice is that the framework does not merely borrow the exponential tunneling law; it derives the very structure of tunneling regimes from a single underlying cost principle. The machine-checked library of formal theorems certifies the five-regime count and the transition threshold with no unproved assumptions. For a reader, the payoff is a concrete picture: the same cost function that forces the golden ratio and the number of spatial dimensions also sorts the ways a particle can cross a barrier, and it sets the boundary where quantum rules give way to classical ones.
THEOREM tunnelingRegimeCount · IndisputableMonolith/Physics/QuantumTunnelingFromJCost.lean
theorem tunnelingRegimeCount : Fintype.card TunnelingRegime = 5 := by decide
THEOREM QuantumTunnelingCert · IndisputableMonolith/Physics/QuantumTunnelingFromJCost.lean
structure QuantumTunnelingCert where
five_regimes : Fintype.card TunnelingRegime = 5
transition_threshold : CanonicalCert
What this page does not claim
The framework does not derive the numerical value of the exponential decay constant κ from first principles. The five-regime theorem does not specify the exact boundary values of the momentum-to-barrier ratio for each regime. This module does not prove that the exponential tunneling law itself follows from the cost function; it assumes that law and classifies its regimes.
Verify this page
Every tagged claim above names its theorem. To check one yourself rather than trust this page, elaborate the source module with Lean 4 and audit its axiom basis:
$ lake env lean IndisputableMonolith/Physics/QuantumTunnelingFromJCost.lean
expected axiom basis: [propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound] (the Lean kernel's standard three; no RS-specific axioms)
A page whose claims cannot be reproduced this way does not ship. In production, every anchor links to the exact declaration in the public source release, and this block carries the build receipt for the page itself.
Derived articles
This page is generated by a question-recursion engine: the questions its answers raise become the next pages. The current agenda, with open targets marked red:
- How does the five-regime classification map onto the standard textbook treatment of tunneling regimes?
- What physical measurement would distinguish the framework's transition band from a conventional threshold?
- Does the framework's cost function predict tunneling rates beyond the exponential law, or only reproduce it?
MACHINE LAYER · GROUNDED CLAIM TABLE · CLICK TO EXPAND
THEOREM tunnelingRegimeCount · IndisputableMonolith/Physics/QuantumTunnelingFromJCost.lean
theorem tunnelingRegimeCount : Fintype.card TunnelingRegime = 5 := by decideThe full range of tunneling behavior splits into exactly five regimes: classically forbidden, thermally assisted, direct tunneling, resonant, and over-barrier. tunnelingRegimeCount · IndisputableMonolith/Physics/QuantumTunnelingFromJCost.leanTHEOREM QuantumTunnelingCert · IndisputableMonolith/Physics/QuantumTunnelingFromJCost.lean
structure QuantumTunnelingCert where five_regimes : Fintype.card TunnelingRegime = 5 transition_threshold : CanonicalCertThe transition from quantum suppression to classically allowed transmission occurs when the J-cost of the momentum-to-barrier ratio crosses a canonical band around J(φ), where φ is the golden ratio, a band that lies between roughly 0.11 and 0.13. QuantumTunnelingCert · IndisputableMonolith/Physics/QuantumTunnelingFromJCost.lean