Encyclopedia Physics Physics Magnon Dispersion2
ARTICLE 5 claims 1 theorem 2 measured
Physics Magnon Dispersion2
A ferromagnet's spin-wave stiffness, expressed through a universal cost function, and what the formal proof actually establishes.
Magnon dispersion in the framework
In a ferromagnet, a magnon is a quantized collective excitation of the spin lattice, and its energy depends on the wavevector through a stiffness constant D. For iron, the measured stiffness is about 370 meV·Å². The Recognition Science framework models this stiffness as D = J(φ) · k_B · T_Curie · a² / ħ², where T_Curie is the Curie temperature (1043 K for iron), a is the lattice constant (2.87 Å), and J is the universal cost function derived in the framework. The result is order-of-magnitude consistent with the measured value.
In Recognition Science, the cost function J(x) = (x + 1/x)/2 - 1 measures the forced cost of recognition when a ratio deviates from unity. The module defines a domain cost as J(m/e), the cost of a ratio between two quantities m and e. The machine-checked library of formal theorems proves three general facts about this cost: it vanishes when m = e, it is nonnegative for positive inputs, and the threshold φ - 3/2 is positive. These are universal properties of J, not results specific to magnons.
What the module does not do is connect m and e to any physical magnon quantity. The definition of domainCost is just J(m/e) with no reference to spin, wavevector, or stiffness. The docstring states plainly that the physics is a research note, not a theorem. To make this a theorem about magnons, one would need to define m and e in terms of magnon variables. That step is not present.
So the honest summary: the framework provides a candidate formula for the magnon stiffness that matches experiment to order of magnitude, and the formal proof establishes only the general properties of the cost function. The physical identification of m and e remains open.
MEASURED domainCost · IndisputableMonolith/Physics/MagnonDispersion2.lean
def domainCost (m e : ℝ) : ℝ := Jcost (m / e)
MEASURED domainCost · IndisputableMonolith/Physics/MagnonDispersion2.lean
def domainCost (m e : ℝ) : ℝ := Jcost (m / e)
MODEL domainCost · IndisputableMonolith/Physics/MagnonDispersion2.lean
def domainCost (m e : ℝ) : ℝ := Jcost (m / e)
THEOREM domainCost_at_eq · domainCost_nonneg · canonicalThreshold_pos · IndisputableMonolith/Physics/MagnonDispersion2.lean
theorem domainCost_at_eq (r : ℝ) (h : r ≠ 0) : domainCost r r = 0 := by
unfold domainCost; rw [div_self h]; exact Jcost_unit0
theorem domainCost_nonneg (m e : ℝ) (hm : 0 < m) (he : 0 < e) : 0 ≤ domainCost m e := by
unfold domainCost; exact Jcost_nonneg (div_pos hm he)
theorem canonicalThreshold_pos : 0 < canonicalThreshold := by
unfold canonicalThreshold; linarith [phi_gt_onePointFive]
What this page does not claim
This module proves a theorem about magnon physics. The stiffness formula is derived from the framework's axioms. The order-of-magnitude agreement is a precise measurement match. The quantities m and e are defined in physical terms.
Verify this page
Every tagged claim above names its theorem. To check one yourself rather than trust this page, elaborate the source module with Lean 4 and audit its axiom basis:
$ lake env lean IndisputableMonolith/Physics/MagnonDispersion2.lean
expected axiom basis: [propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound] (the Lean kernel's standard three; no RS-specific axioms)
A page whose claims cannot be reproduced this way does not ship. In production, every anchor links to the exact declaration in the public source release, and this block carries the build receipt for the page itself.
Derived articles
This page is generated by a question-recursion engine: the questions its answers raise become the next pages. The current agenda, with open targets marked red:
- What physical quantities should m and e represent to turn the cost function into a magnon dispersion relation?
- Does the order-of-magnitude agreement survive a precise fit of the stiffness formula to measured magnon spectra?
- How does the framework derive the Curie temperature and lattice constant from first principles?
- Can the same cost function produce dispersion relations for other collective excitations, such as phonons?
- What is the exact relation between the universal cost function and the spin-wave Hamiltonian?
MACHINE LAYER · GROUNDED CLAIM TABLE · CLICK TO EXPAND
MEASURED domainCost · IndisputableMonolith/Physics/MagnonDispersion2.lean
def domainCost (m e : ℝ) : ℝ := Jcost (m / e)In a ferromagnet, a magnon is a quantized collective excitation of the spin lattice, and its energy depends on the wavevector through a stiffness constant D. domainCost · IndisputableMonolith/Physics/MagnonDispersion2.leanMEASURED domainCost · IndisputableMonolith/Physics/MagnonDispersion2.lean
def domainCost (m e : ℝ) : ℝ := Jcost (m / e)For iron, the measured stiffness is about 370 meV·Å². domainCost · IndisputableMonolith/Physics/MagnonDispersion2.leanMODEL domainCost · IndisputableMonolith/Physics/MagnonDispersion2.lean
def domainCost (m e : ℝ) : ℝ := Jcost (m / e)The Recognition Science framework models this stiffness as D = J(φ) · k_B · T_Curie · a² / ħ² domainCost · IndisputableMonolith/Physics/MagnonDispersion2.leanTHEOREM domainCost_at_eq · domainCost_nonneg · canonicalThreshold_pos · IndisputableMonolith/Physics/MagnonDispersion2.lean
theorem domainCost_at_eq (r : ℝ) (h : r ≠ 0) : domainCost r r = 0 := by unfold domainCost; rw [div_self h]; exact Jcost_unit0theorem domainCost_nonneg (m e : ℝ) (hm : 0 < m) (he : 0 < e) : 0 ≤ domainCost m e := by unfold domainCost; exact Jcost_nonneg (div_pos hm he)theorem canonicalThreshold_pos : 0 < canonicalThreshold := by unfold canonicalThreshold; linarith [phi_gt_onePointFive]The machine-checked library of formal theorems proves three general facts about this cost: it vanishes when m = e, it is nonnegative for positive inputs, and the threshold φ - 3/2 is positive. domainCost_at_eq · domainCost_nonneg · canonicalThreshold_pos · IndisputableMonolith/Physics/MagnonDispersion2.lean- OPENThe physical identification of m and e remains open.