Encyclopedia Physics Physics Ising2 D
ARTICLE 4 claims 3 theorems 1 model
Physics Ising2 D
A famous exact solution in statistical physics becomes a diagnostic test for a framework that claims to derive three dimensions.
The two-dimensional Ising check
The two-dimensional Ising model is a lattice of tiny magnets, each pointing up or down, that was solved exactly by Lars Onsager in 1944. Near its critical temperature, where the material flips between ordered and disordered states, its behavior is described by a set of exponents: ν = 1, η = 1/4, β = 1/8, γ = 7/4, and δ = 15. These are exact rational numbers, not approximations, and they satisfy the four scaling relations of critical phenomena: Rushbrooke, Fisher, Widom, and hyperscaling.
In Recognition Science, the framework's core result forces three spatial dimensions as the unique physical dimension. Its leading-order prediction for the correlation length exponent is ν₀ = φ⁻¹ ≈ 0.618, where φ is the golden ratio. The two-dimensional Ising model provides a sharp test: the Onsager value is ν = 1, which is larger than 0.618 by more than 0.38, a 38 percent discrepancy. This is not a failure of the framework; it is a diagnostic. The framework derives D = 3, so its formulas are not expected to reproduce the D = 2 case.
The module ledger, a discrete record of events, verifies the Onsager exponents satisfy all four scaling relations, including the hyperscaling relation Dν = 2 − α, which holds only in two dimensions. It then proves the RS leading-order value falls below the Onsager value. The certificate bundles these results: the classical exponents are internally consistent, and the framework's prediction does not match them, exactly as expected for a theory that singles out three dimensions.
The practical lesson is that the framework's reach is dimension-specific. The golden-ratio formula works in three dimensions, where it was derived, and fails in two, where it was never claimed to apply. The module documents this boundary explicitly, turning a potential embarrassment into a precise statement about the framework's domain of validity.
MODEL nu_onsager · eta_onsager · beta_onsager · gamma_onsager · delta_onsager · IndisputableMonolith/Physics/Ising2D.lean
def nu_onsager : ℝ := 1
def eta_onsager : ℝ := 1 / 4
def beta_onsager : ℝ := 1 / 8
def gamma_onsager : ℝ := 7 / 4
def delta_onsager : ℝ := 15
THEOREM rushbrooke_onsager · fisher_onsager · widom_onsager · hyperscaling_onsager · IndisputableMonolith/Physics/Ising2D.lean
/-- Rushbrooke: α + 2β + γ = 0 + 2·(1/8) + 7/4 = 0 + 1/4 + 7/4 = 2. -/
theorem rushbrooke_onsager : alpha_onsager + 2 * beta_onsager + gamma_onsager = 2 := by
unfold alpha_onsager beta_onsager gamma_onsager D2 nu_onsager; ring
/-- Fisher: γ = ν(2 − η) = 1·(2 − 1/4) = 7/4. -/
theorem fisher_onsager : gamma_onsager = nu_onsager * (2 - eta_onsager) := by
unfold gamma_onsager nu_onsager eta_onsager; ring
/-- Widom: γ = β(δ − 1) = (1/8)·14 = 14/8 = 7/4. -/
theorem widom_onsager : gamma_onsager = beta_onsager * (delta_onsager - 1) := by
unfold gamma_onsager beta_onsager delta_onsager; ring
/-- Hyperscaling (D = 2): Dν = 2 − α → 2·1 = 2 − 0 = 2. -/
theorem hyperscaling_onsager : D2 * nu_onsager = 2 - alpha_onsager := by
simp only [D2, nu_onsager, alpha_onsager]; ring
THEOREM rs_leading_order_below_onsager · IndisputableMonolith/Physics/Ising2D.lean
/-- RS leading-order ν₀ = φ⁻¹ < 1 = ν_Onsager. -/
theorem rs_leading_order_below_onsager : 1 / phi < nu_onsager := by
unfold nu_onsager
have h := one_lt_phi
have hp := phi_pos
have : 1 / phi < 1 / 1 := by
exact (one_div_lt_one_div phi_pos (by norm_num : (0:ℝ) < 1)).mpr h
linarith
THEOREM onsager_rs_gap · IndisputableMonolith/Physics/Ising2D.lean
/-- The gap: ν_Onsager − ν₀ > 0.38 (a 38% discrepancy). -/
theorem onsager_rs_gap : (0.38 : ℝ) < nu_onsager - 1 / phi := by
unfold nu_onsager
have h_upper : 1 / phi < (0.619 : ℝ) :=
calc 1 / phi < 1 / (1.618 : ℝ) :=
(one_div_lt_one_div phi_pos (by norm_num : (0:ℝ) < 1.618)).mpr phi_gt_1618
_ < (0.619 : ℝ) := by norm_num
linarith
What this page does not claim
The RS framework predicts the Onsager exponents in two dimensions. The discrepancy between the RS value and the Onsager value is a contradiction of the framework. The Onsager solution itself is derived from the RS framework.
Verify this page
Every tagged claim above names its theorem. To check one yourself rather than trust this page, elaborate the source module with Lean 4 and audit its axiom basis:
$ lake env lean IndisputableMonolith/Physics/Ising2D.lean
expected axiom basis: [propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound] (the Lean kernel's standard three; no RS-specific axioms)
A page whose claims cannot be reproduced this way does not ship. In production, every anchor links to the exact declaration in the public source release, and this block carries the build receipt for the page itself.
Derived articles
This page is generated by a question-recursion engine: the questions its answers raise become the next pages. The current agenda, with open targets marked red:
- What is the exact relationship between the golden ratio and the critical exponents in three dimensions?
- Does the RS framework reproduce the Onsager exponents in any dimension other than three?
- What is the physical interpretation of the discrepancy between the RS leading-order value and the Onsager value?
- Are there other exactly solvable models that can serve as diagnostics for the RS dimension forcing?
MACHINE LAYER · GROUNDED CLAIM TABLE · CLICK TO EXPAND
MODEL nu_onsager · eta_onsager · beta_onsager · gamma_onsager · delta_onsager · IndisputableMonolith/Physics/Ising2D.lean
def nu_onsager : ℝ := 1def eta_onsager : ℝ := 1 / 4def beta_onsager : ℝ := 1 / 8def gamma_onsager : ℝ := 7 / 4def delta_onsager : ℝ := 15The Onsager exponents for the two-dimensional Ising model are ν = 1, η = 1/4, β = 1/8, γ = 7/4, and δ = 15. nu_onsager · eta_onsager · beta_onsager · gamma_onsager · delta_onsager · IndisputableMonolith/Physics/Ising2D.leanTHEOREM rushbrooke_onsager · fisher_onsager · widom_onsager · hyperscaling_onsager · IndisputableMonolith/Physics/Ising2D.lean
/-- Rushbrooke: α + 2β + γ = 0 + 2·(1/8) + 7/4 = 0 + 1/4 + 7/4 = 2. -/ theorem rushbrooke_onsager : alpha_onsager + 2 * beta_onsager + gamma_onsager = 2 := by unfold alpha_onsager beta_onsager gamma_onsager D2 nu_onsager; ring/-- Fisher: γ = ν(2 − η) = 1·(2 − 1/4) = 7/4. -/ theorem fisher_onsager : gamma_onsager = nu_onsager * (2 - eta_onsager) := by unfold gamma_onsager nu_onsager eta_onsager; ring/-- Widom: γ = β(δ − 1) = (1/8)·14 = 14/8 = 7/4. -/ theorem widom_onsager : gamma_onsager = beta_onsager * (delta_onsager - 1) := by unfold gamma_onsager beta_onsager delta_onsager; ring/-- Hyperscaling (D = 2): Dν = 2 − α → 2·1 = 2 − 0 = 2. -/ theorem hyperscaling_onsager : D2 * nu_onsager = 2 - alpha_onsager := by simp only [D2, nu_onsager, alpha_onsager]; ringThe Onsager exponents satisfy the Rushbrooke, Fisher, Widom, and hyperscaling scaling relations. rushbrooke_onsager · fisher_onsager · widom_onsager · hyperscaling_onsager · IndisputableMonolith/Physics/Ising2D.leanTHEOREM rs_leading_order_below_onsager · IndisputableMonolith/Physics/Ising2D.lean
/-- RS leading-order ν₀ = φ⁻¹ < 1 = ν_Onsager. -/ theorem rs_leading_order_below_onsager : 1 / phi < nu_onsager := by unfold nu_onsager have h := one_lt_phi have hp := phi_pos have : 1 / phi < 1 / 1 := by exact (one_div_lt_one_div phi_pos (by norm_num : (0:ℝ) < 1)).mpr h linarithThe RS leading-order value 1/φ is less than the Onsager ν = 1. rs_leading_order_below_onsager · IndisputableMonolith/Physics/Ising2D.leanTHEOREM onsager_rs_gap · IndisputableMonolith/Physics/Ising2D.lean
/-- The gap: ν_Onsager − ν₀ > 0.38 (a 38% discrepancy). -/ theorem onsager_rs_gap : (0.38 : ℝ) < nu_onsager - 1 / phi := by unfold nu_onsager have h_upper : 1 / phi < (0.619 : ℝ) := calc 1 / phi < 1 / (1.618 : ℝ) := (one_div_lt_one_div phi_pos (by norm_num : (0:ℝ) < 1.618)).mpr phi_gt_1618 _ < (0.619 : ℝ) := by norm_num linarithThe gap between the Onsager ν and the RS leading-order value is greater than 0.38. onsager_rs_gap · IndisputableMonolith/Physics/Ising2D.lean