Encyclopedia Numerics Numerics Interval Pow Phi Pow Neg5 In Interval
ARTICLE 2 claims 2 theorems
Numerics Interval Pow Phi Pow Neg5 In Interval
A machine-checked proof pins the golden ratio raised to the minus fifth power between two rational numbers, a small but exact step in a larger program.
A certified bound for phi to the minus fifth
The golden ratio, usually written φ, is the number (1 + √5)/2, approximately 1.6180339887. It is the positive solution to the equation x² = x + 1, and it appears throughout geometry, art, and number theory. When raised to the power −5, φ⁻⁵ is about 0.0901699437. This value is not just an approximation; it can be bounded exactly between two rational numbers.
The declaration phi_pow_neg5_in_interval, part of a machine-checked library of formal theorems, establishes precisely this: the number φ⁻⁵ lies in the closed interval from 89/1000 to 91/1000. In decimal form, that means 0.089 ≤ φ⁻⁵ ≤ 0.091. The proof is rigorous, meaning it does not rely on numerical approximation or floating-point arithmetic. Instead, it uses the monotonicity of the power function and the definition of φ to verify the bounds symbolically.
This interval bound is a building block, not a destination. The library uses such certified intervals to support larger claims about the golden ratio and its powers. The specific interval for φ⁻⁵ is notable because this quantity appears in the framework's constants, where it is identified with the reduced Planck constant in natural units. The theorem does not assert that identification; it only certifies the numerical range.
What the declaration does not claim is just as important. It does not say that φ⁻⁵ is exactly 0.09, nor does it claim any physical significance for the number. It does not assert that the golden ratio itself is rational or irrational; that is a separate matter. The theorem is purely about the interval: a precise, machine-verified statement that the value falls between two rational bounds. This kind of exactness is what makes the larger framework's numerical claims auditable.
THEOREM phi_pow_neg5_in_interval · IndisputableMonolith/Numerics/Interval/Pow.lean
theorem phi_pow_neg5_in_interval : phi_pow_neg5_interval.contains (((1 + Real.sqrt 5) / 2) ^ (-5 : ℝ)) := by
-- φ^(-5) = (φ⁻¹)^5
simp only [Interval.contains, phi_pow_neg5_interval]
rw [← phi_eq_formula]
have hpos : (0 : ℝ) < goldenRatio := Real.goldenRatio_pos
have h : goldenRatio ^ (-5 : ℝ) = goldenRatio⁻¹ ^ 5 := by
rw [Real.rpow_neg (le_of_lt hpos)]
have : (5 : ℝ) = (5 : ℕ) := by norm_num
rw [this, Real.rpow_natCast, inv_pow]
rw [h]
have hcontains := phi_inv5_in_interval_proven
simp only [Interval.contains, phi_inv5_interval_proven] at hcontains
constructor
· have h1 : ((89 / 1000 : ℚ) : ℝ) = (0.089 : ℝ) := by norm_num
linarith [hcontains.1]
· have h1 : ((91 / 1000 : ℚ) : ℝ) = (0.091 : ℝ) := by norm_num
linarith [hcontains.2]
THEOREM phi_rpow_strictMono · phi_eq_formula · IndisputableMonolith/Numerics/Interval/Pow.lean
/-- φ > 1, so φ^x is strictly increasing in x -/
lemma phi_rpow_strictMono : StrictMono (fun x : ℝ => goldenRatio ^ x) := by
intro y z hyz
exact Real.rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_lt Real.one_lt_goldenRatio hyz
/-- φ = (1 + √5)/2 (Mathlib definition) -/
theorem phi_eq_formula : goldenRatio = (1 + Real.sqrt 5) / 2 := rfl
What this page does not claim
The theorem does not assert that φ⁻⁵ equals any specific decimal value. It does not claim physical significance for the number φ⁻⁵. It does not state whether the golden ratio is rational or irrational.
Verify this page
Every tagged claim above names its theorem. To check one yourself rather than trust this page, elaborate the source module with Lean 4 and audit its axiom basis:
$ lake env lean IndisputableMonolith/Numerics/Interval/Pow.lean
expected axiom basis: [propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound] (the Lean kernel's standard three; no RS-specific axioms)
A page whose claims cannot be reproduced this way does not ship. In production, every anchor links to the exact declaration in the public source release, and this block carries the build receipt for the page itself.
Derived articles
This page is generated by a question-recursion engine: the questions its answers raise become the next pages. The current agenda, with open targets marked red:
- How does the framework derive the reduced Planck constant from φ⁻⁵?
- What other powers of the golden ratio have certified interval bounds in the library?
- How are these interval theorems used to support claims about physical constants?
MACHINE LAYER · GROUNDED CLAIM TABLE · CLICK TO EXPAND
THEOREM phi_pow_neg5_in_interval · IndisputableMonolith/Numerics/Interval/Pow.lean
theorem phi_pow_neg5_in_interval : phi_pow_neg5_interval.contains (((1 + Real.sqrt 5) / 2) ^ (-5 : ℝ)) := by -- φ^(-5) = (φ⁻¹)^5 simp only [Interval.contains, phi_pow_neg5_interval] rw [← phi_eq_formula] have hpos : (0 : ℝ) < goldenRatio := Real.goldenRatio_pos have h : goldenRatio ^ (-5 : ℝ) = goldenRatio⁻¹ ^ 5 := by rw [Real.rpow_neg (le_of_lt hpos)] have : (5 : ℝ) = (5 : ℕ) := by norm_num rw [this, Real.rpow_natCast, inv_pow] rw [h] have hcontains := phi_inv5_in_interval_proven simp only [Interval.contains, phi_inv5_interval_proven] at hcontains constructor · have h1 : ((89 / 1000 : ℚ) : ℝ) = (0.089 : ℝ) := by norm_num linarith [hcontains.1] · have h1 : ((91 / 1000 : ℚ) : ℝ) = (0.091 : ℝ) := by norm_num linarith [hcontains.2]The number φ⁻⁵ lies in the closed interval from 89/1000 to 91/1000. phi_pow_neg5_in_interval · IndisputableMonolith/Numerics/Interval/Pow.leanTHEOREM phi_rpow_strictMono · phi_eq_formula · IndisputableMonolith/Numerics/Interval/Pow.lean
/-- φ > 1, so φ^x is strictly increasing in x -/ lemma phi_rpow_strictMono : StrictMono (fun x : ℝ => goldenRatio ^ x) := by intro y z hyz exact Real.rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_lt Real.one_lt_goldenRatio hyz/-- φ = (1 + √5)/2 (Mathlib definition) -/ theorem phi_eq_formula : goldenRatio = (1 + Real.sqrt 5) / 2 := rflThe proof relies on the monotonicity of the power function and the definition of φ. phi_rpow_strictMono · phi_eq_formula · IndisputableMonolith/Numerics/Interval/Pow.lean