Encyclopedia Mathematics Mathematics Fundamental Theorem Calculus From Rs Jcost Minimum
ARTICLE 3 claims 3 theorems
Mathematics Fundamental Theorem Calculus From Rs Jcost Minimum
A theorem in the Recognition Science library pins down the point where the cost of recognition is zero, and it is not a proof of the fundamental theorem of calculus.
The cost minimum
The fundamental theorem of calculus says that differentiation and integration undo each other. In the Recognition Science framework, the same pair of operations appears with a cost attached. The framework models recognition as a ledger, a discrete record of events, and assigns a cost to each recognition event. The cost function J(x) = (x + 1/x)/2 - 1 measures how far a recognition ratio x is from the unit ratio 1. At x = 1, the cost is zero: J(1) = 0, and this point is a strict local minimum, meaning J(x) is positive for every x other than 1.
The theorem jcost_minimum in the framework's machine-checked library of formal theorems establishes exactly that J(1) = 0. It is a structural fact about the cost function, not a numerical accident. The derivative J'(1) equals 0, so the point r = 1 is a critical point and the minimum of the cost. The framework then uses this minimum to build an integral from 1 to r of J'(x) dx, which equals J(r) - J(1) = J(r). This is the framework's version of the fundamental theorem of calculus: the integral of the cost derivative from 1 to r is the total recognition cost.
The framework also counts five canonical calculus theorems, FTC-1, FTC-2, mean value theorem, intermediate value theorem, and L'Hôpital's rule, as a set of size 5. This count is a theorem in the library, proved by deciding the finite type. The minimum at 1 and the strict positivity elsewhere are packaged into a single certificate structure, CalculusCert, which bundles the five-theorem count, the minimum at 1, and the strict minimum property.
What jcost_minimum does not claim is broader. It does not prove the fundamental theorem of calculus in the classical sense. The framework's integral identity is a derivation within its own cost model, not a new proof of the classical theorem. The theorem also does not claim that the cost function is the only possible cost function; that uniqueness is a separate result. And the count of five theorems is a definitional choice about which theorems to include, not a claim about the number of theorems in all of mathematics.
THEOREM jcost_minimum · IndisputableMonolith/Mathematics/FundamentalTheoremCalculusFromRS.lean
/-- J(1) = 0 (minimum, derivative = 0 at critical point). -/
theorem jcost_minimum : Jcost 1 = 0 := Jcost_unit0
THEOREM calculusTheoremCount · IndisputableMonolith/Mathematics/FundamentalTheoremCalculusFromRS.lean
theorem calculusTheoremCount : Fintype.card CalculusTheorem = 5 := by decide
THEOREM jcost_strict_min · IndisputableMonolith/Mathematics/FundamentalTheoremCalculusFromRS.lean
/-- J is positive off minimum (strict local minimum). -/
theorem jcost_strict_min {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) (hne : r ≠ 1) :
0 < Jcost r := Jcost_pos_of_ne_one r hr hne
What this page does not claim
The theorem does not prove the classical fundamental theorem of calculus. The uniqueness of the cost function is a separate result, not established by jcost_minimum. The five-theorem count is a definitional choice, not a claim about all of mathematics.
Verify this page
Every tagged claim above names its theorem. To check one yourself rather than trust this page, elaborate the source module with Lean 4 and audit its axiom basis:
$ lake env lean IndisputableMonolith/Mathematics/FundamentalTheoremCalculusFromRS.lean
expected axiom basis: [propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound] (the Lean kernel's standard three; no RS-specific axioms)
A page whose claims cannot be reproduced this way does not ship. In production, every anchor links to the exact declaration in the public source release, and this block carries the build receipt for the page itself.
Derived articles
This page is generated by a question-recursion engine: the questions its answers raise become the next pages. The current agenda, with open targets marked red:
- What is the full derivation of the cost function J(x) = (x + 1/x)/2 - 1 from the five plain conditions?
- How does the framework's integral identity relate to the classical fundamental theorem of calculus beyond the formal analogy?
- What other structural facts about the cost function follow from the minimum at 1?
- What is the significance of the five-theorem count for the framework's treatment of calculus?
MACHINE LAYER · GROUNDED CLAIM TABLE · CLICK TO EXPAND
THEOREM jcost_minimum · IndisputableMonolith/Mathematics/FundamentalTheoremCalculusFromRS.lean
/-- J(1) = 0 (minimum, derivative = 0 at critical point). -/ theorem jcost_minimum : Jcost 1 = 0 := Jcost_unit0The theorem jcost_minimum establishes exactly that J(1) = 0. jcost_minimum · IndisputableMonolith/Mathematics/FundamentalTheoremCalculusFromRS.leanTHEOREM calculusTheoremCount · IndisputableMonolith/Mathematics/FundamentalTheoremCalculusFromRS.lean
theorem calculusTheoremCount : Fintype.card CalculusTheorem = 5 := by decideThe framework also counts five canonical calculus theorems, FTC-1, FTC-2, mean value theorem, intermediate value theorem, and L'Hôpital's rule, as a set of size 5. calculusTheoremCount · IndisputableMonolith/Mathematics/FundamentalTheoremCalculusFromRS.leanTHEOREM jcost_strict_min · IndisputableMonolith/Mathematics/FundamentalTheoremCalculusFromRS.lean
/-- J is positive off minimum (strict local minimum). -/ theorem jcost_strict_min {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) (hne : r ≠ 1) : 0 < Jcost r := Jcost_pos_of_ne_one r hr hneAt x = 1, the cost is zero: J(1) = 0, and this point is a strict local minimum, meaning J(x) is positive for every x other than 1. jcost_strict_min · IndisputableMonolith/Mathematics/FundamentalTheoremCalculusFromRS.lean