Encyclopedia Materials Materials Superalloy From Phi Ladder

ARTICLE 4 claims 1 theorem 1 measured

Materials Superalloy From Phi Ladder

Nickel superalloys gain strength from tiny gamma-prime particles; Recognition Science offers a phi-ladder estimate for their optimal size, but the formal proof stops short of the material claim.

Superalloy precipitate sizes

Nickel-based superalloys, the workhorses of jet turbine blades, owe their high-temperature strength to precipitates: tiny particles of the gamma-prime phase, typically 100 to 500 nanometers across, that block the motion of dislocations. Metallurgists tune their size and spacing to maximize creep resistance. Recognition Science enters with a simple scaling guess: the optimal precipitate size equals phi raised to a power times the lattice parameter, where phi is the golden ratio, about 1.618. For a nickel lattice parameter near 0.36 nanometers, phi^8 through phi^11 gives roughly 47 to 71 nanometers, and slightly higher powers reach 300 nanometers, overlapping the observed range.

The framework's machine-checked library of formal theorems, however, proves nothing specific to superalloys. The module defines a cost function on a ratio of two real numbers, m over e, as J(m/e), where J is the framework's forced recognition cost. The three proved facts are general: the cost vanishes when m equals e, it is nonnegative for positive inputs, and the threshold phi minus 3/2 is positive. These statements hold for any positive m and e; they do not mention precipitates, nickel, or lattice parameters. The research note in the source openly records that the material application was the intended direction, not a result.

To turn the module into a theorem about superalloys, one would need a definition of m and e in metallurgical terms, for example m as a measured precipitate size and e as an optimal size derived from the lattice. Without that bridge, the formal content is a template shared verbatim with 2383 sibling modules. The honest summary: the framework provides a cost function with clean formal properties, and a phi-ladder estimate for precipitate size that is a hypothesis, not a proved consequence.

MEASURED domainCost · IndisputableMonolith/Materials/SuperalloyFromPhiLadder.lean
def domainCost (m e : ℝ) : ℝ := Jcost (m / e)
MODEL domainCost · IndisputableMonolith/Materials/SuperalloyFromPhiLadder.lean
def domainCost (m e : ℝ) : ℝ := Jcost (m / e)
THEOREM domainCost_at_eq · domainCost_nonneg · canonicalThreshold_pos · IndisputableMonolith/Materials/SuperalloyFromPhiLadder.lean
theorem domainCost_at_eq (r : ℝ) (h : r ≠ 0) : domainCost r r = 0 := by
  unfold domainCost; rw [div_self h]; exact Jcost_unit0
theorem domainCost_nonneg (m e : ℝ) (hm : 0 < m) (he : 0 < e) : 0 ≤ domainCost m e := by
  unfold domainCost; exact Jcost_nonneg (div_pos hm he)
theorem canonicalThreshold_pos : 0 < canonicalThreshold := by
  unfold canonicalThreshold; linarith [phi_gt_onePointFive]

What this page does not claim

The phi-ladder precipitate size is a proved theorem of Recognition Science. The module establishes any fact specific to nickel superalloys. The 47 to 300 nanometer range is a measured or certified optimal size.

Verify this page

Every tagged claim above names its theorem. To check one yourself rather than trust this page, elaborate the source module with Lean 4 and audit its axiom basis:

$ lake env lean IndisputableMonolith/Materials/SuperalloyFromPhiLadder.lean
expected axiom basis: [propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound] (the Lean kernel's standard three; no RS-specific axioms)

A page whose claims cannot be reproduced this way does not ship. In production, every anchor links to the exact declaration in the public source release, and this block carries the build receipt for the page itself.

Derived articles

This page is generated by a question-recursion engine: the questions its answers raise become the next pages. The current agenda, with open targets marked red:

MACHINE LAYER · GROUNDED CLAIM TABLE · CLICK TO EXPAND