Encyclopedia Materials Materials Metamaterial Band Gap From Phi Ladder Gap Freq Adjacent Ratio

ARTICLE 3 claims 3 theorems

Materials Metamaterial Band Gap From Phi Ladder Gap Freq Adjacent Ratio

In a golden-ratio metamaterial, the gap frequencies between neighboring bands stand in a fixed ratio: the golden ratio itself.

The adjacent-rung ratio

A photonic metamaterial is an engineered structure that controls light the way a crystal controls electrons: certain frequencies cannot pass through, forming band gaps. In a one-dimensional Fibonacci arrangement, theory and experiment (Macià-Barber 2009, Wang et al. 2017) show that these gaps appear in a self-similar cascade. The declaration gapFreq_adjacent_ratio states the clean version of that observation: for any rung k on the ladder, the ratio of the next gap-center frequency to the current one is exactly the golden ratio φ ≈ 1.618.

Formally, the framework defines a reference frequency referenceFreq as 1, then sets the gap-center frequency at rung k to referenceFreq * φ^k. The theorem proves that gapFreq (k+1) / gapFreq k = φ for every natural number k. It also proves that these frequencies are all positive and strictly increasing. These are not empirical claims; they are consequences of the definition, checked in the machine-checked library of formal theorems with no unproved assumptions.

What the declaration does not claim: it does not say that any real material actually exhibits this ratio. The theorem only describes the mathematical model. The empirical match to Fibonacci photonic crystals is a separate observation, cited from the literature, not a theorem. Nor does it claim that the golden ratio emerges from deeper physics here; the φ-ladder is a structural choice, not a derived law. The theorem is a precise statement about the model's internal consistency, not a prediction about a specific fabricated sample.

THEOREM gapFreq_adjacent_ratio · IndisputableMonolith/Materials/MetamaterialBandGapFromPhiLadder.lean
theorem gapFreq_adjacent_ratio (k : ℕ) :
    gapFreq (k + 1) / gapFreq k = phi := by
  rw [gapFreq_succ_ratio]
  have hpos : 0 < gapFreq k := gapFreq_pos k
  field_simp [hpos.ne']
THEOREM gapFreq_pos · gapFreq_strictly_increasing · IndisputableMonolith/Materials/MetamaterialBandGapFromPhiLadder.lean
theorem gapFreq_pos (k : ℕ) : 0 < gapFreq k := by
  unfold gapFreq referenceFreq
  have : 0 < phi ^ k := pow_pos Constants.phi_pos k
  linarith [this]
theorem gapFreq_strictly_increasing (k : ℕ) :
    gapFreq k < gapFreq (k + 1) := by
  rw [gapFreq_succ_ratio]
  have hk : 0 < gapFreq k := gapFreq_pos k
  have hphi_gt_one : (1 : ℝ) < phi := by
    have := Constants.phi_gt_onePointFive; linarith
  have : gapFreq k * 1 < gapFreq k * phi :=
    mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left hphi_gt_one hk
  simpa using this
THEOREM gapFreq_adjacent_ratio · IndisputableMonolith/Materials/MetamaterialBandGapFromPhiLadder.lean
theorem gapFreq_adjacent_ratio (k : ℕ) :
    gapFreq (k + 1) / gapFreq k = phi := by
  rw [gapFreq_succ_ratio]
  have hpos : 0 < gapFreq k := gapFreq_pos k
  field_simp [hpos.ne']

What this page does not claim

The theorem does not claim that any real material exhibits the φ ratio. The theorem does not claim that the φ-ladder is derived from first principles; it is a structural definition. The theorem does not claim the empirical cascade is exact; that is a literature observation, not a formal result.

Verify this page

Every tagged claim above names its theorem. To check one yourself rather than trust this page, elaborate the source module with Lean 4 and audit its axiom basis:

$ lake env lean IndisputableMonolith/Materials/MetamaterialBandGapFromPhiLadder.lean
expected axiom basis: [propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound] (the Lean kernel's standard three; no RS-specific axioms)

A page whose claims cannot be reproduced this way does not ship. In production, every anchor links to the exact declaration in the public source release, and this block carries the build receipt for the page itself.

Derived articles

This page is generated by a question-recursion engine: the questions its answers raise become the next pages. The current agenda, with open targets marked red:

MACHINE LAYER · GROUNDED CLAIM TABLE · CLICK TO EXPAND