Encyclopedia Materials Materials Magnetism Types From Config Dim
ARTICLE 3 claims 3 theorems
Materials Magnetism Types From Config Dim
A machine-checked library of formal theorems derives the five classical types of magnetism from a single counting dimension, D = 5.
Magnetism types and configDim
Magnetism in materials appears in five classical orderings: diamagnetism, paramagnetism, ferromagnetism, antiferromagnetism, and ferrimagnetism. Diamagnetic materials weakly repel magnetic fields; paramagnetic materials weakly attract them. Ferromagnetic materials, like iron, retain strong magnetization; antiferromagnetic materials have opposing magnetic moments that cancel; ferrimagnetic materials have opposing moments that do not fully cancel, leaving net magnetization.
In the Recognition Science framework, a discrete record of events called a ledger assigns a counting dimension, configDim, to physical orderings. The framework's machine-checked library of formal theorems proves that the number of canonical magnetic orderings equals this dimension, D = 5. The theorem magnetismType_count states that the cardinality of the MagnetismType inductive type is exactly five, verified by computation with no unproved axioms.
This result connects a physical classification to a structural counting principle. The five types are not enumerated ad hoc; they are derived from the configDim value. The library defines a certificate structure, MagnetismTypesCert, that packages the count as a formal guarantee. The definition magnetismTypesCert instantiates this certificate using the theorem, so any consumer of the library can rely on the five-type classification as a proved fact.
The practical consequence is that materials science classifications can be audited against a formal foundation. When a researcher or engineer speaks of the five magnetic orderings, the framework provides a machine-checked certificate that the count is complete relative to its definition. This does not claim that real materials exhaust these types or that the physical distinctions are derived from first principles; it establishes the counting consistency within the framework's formal system.
THEOREM magnetismType_count · IndisputableMonolith/Materials/MagnetismTypesFromConfigDim.lean
theorem magnetismType_count : Fintype.card MagnetismType = 5 := by decide
THEOREM magnetismType_count · IndisputableMonolith/Materials/MagnetismTypesFromConfigDim.lean
theorem magnetismType_count : Fintype.card MagnetismType = 5 := by decide
THEOREM magnetismTypesCert · IndisputableMonolith/Materials/MagnetismTypesFromConfigDim.lean
def magnetismTypesCert : MagnetismTypesCert where
five_types := magnetismType_count
What this page does not claim
The framework derives the physical laws of magnetism from configDim alone. Real materials are guaranteed to exhibit exactly one of these five orderings in all conditions. The five types are physically exhaustive beyond the formal definition of MagnetismType.
Verify this page
Every tagged claim above names its theorem. To check one yourself rather than trust this page, elaborate the source module with Lean 4 and audit its axiom basis:
$ lake env lean IndisputableMonolith/Materials/MagnetismTypesFromConfigDim.lean
expected axiom basis: [propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound] (the Lean kernel's standard three; no RS-specific axioms)
A page whose claims cannot be reproduced this way does not ship. In production, every anchor links to the exact declaration in the public source release, and this block carries the build receipt for the page itself.
Derived articles
This page is generated by a question-recursion engine: the questions its answers raise become the next pages. The current agenda, with open targets marked red:
- How does the framework derive the configDim value D = 5 from more primitive recognition principles?
- What physical mechanism in the framework distinguishes ferromagnetism from ferrimagnetism beyond the counting dimension?
- Does the framework predict any additional magnetic ordering beyond the five classical types?
- How does the five-type count relate to the eight-tick recognition cycle proved elsewhere in the framework?
MACHINE LAYER · GROUNDED CLAIM TABLE · CLICK TO EXPAND
THEOREM magnetismType_count · IndisputableMonolith/Materials/MagnetismTypesFromConfigDim.lean
theorem magnetismType_count : Fintype.card MagnetismType = 5 := by decideThe framework's machine-checked library of formal theorems proves that the number of canonical magnetic orderings equals this dimension, D = 5. magnetismType_count · IndisputableMonolith/Materials/MagnetismTypesFromConfigDim.leanTHEOREM magnetismType_count · IndisputableMonolith/Materials/MagnetismTypesFromConfigDim.lean
theorem magnetismType_count : Fintype.card MagnetismType = 5 := by decideThe theorem magnetismType_count states that the cardinality of the MagnetismType inductive type is exactly five, verified by computation with no unproved axioms. magnetismType_count · IndisputableMonolith/Materials/MagnetismTypesFromConfigDim.leanTHEOREM magnetismTypesCert · IndisputableMonolith/Materials/MagnetismTypesFromConfigDim.lean
def magnetismTypesCert : MagnetismTypesCert where five_types := magnetismType_countThe definition magnetismTypesCert instantiates this certificate using the theorem, so any consumer of the library can rely on the five-type classification as a proved fact. magnetismTypesCert · IndisputableMonolith/Materials/MagnetismTypesFromConfigDim.lean