Encyclopedia Materials Materials Grain Boundary Energy Rs
ARTICLE 5 claims 4 theorems 1 model
Materials Grain Boundary Energy Rs
In materials science, grain boundary energy is the extra free energy where two crystal grains meet; Recognition Science models it with a universal cost function.
Grain boundary energy in the framework
Grain boundary energy is the thermodynamic cost, per unit area, of the interface where two crystals of the same phase meet at different orientations. Typical measured values for metals fall between about 0.5 and 1.0 J/m². The boundary is a defect: atoms there are not in either grain's perfect lattice, so the system pays an energy penalty that drives grain growth and recrystallization.
In Recognition Science, the module models this energy as a fraction of the surface energy. The defining choice is cost, the price reality pays to register a recognition event; the framework proves a unique dimensionless cost function J(x) = (x + 1/x)/2 - 1. The module sets the grain boundary energy to J(phi) times the surface energy gamma_s, which evaluates to 0.118 * gamma_s. For steel with gamma_s about 2 J/m², that gives roughly 0.236 J/m², a lower bound consistent with the measured range.
The machine-checked library of formal theorems proves three general facts about this cost function, not about grain boundaries specifically. First, the cost vanishes when the two inputs are equal: domainCost r r = 0 for any nonzero r. Second, the cost is nonnegative for positive inputs. Third, the threshold phi - 3/2 is positive. These are properties of the universal cost function, instantiated here with the ratio m/e.
What the module does not do is derive the grain boundary energy from first principles. The docstring is explicit: the numerical value 0.118 is a research note, not a theorem. The formal content is a template shared verbatim with 2383 sibling modules, each applying the same cost function to a different domain. To make this a theorem about grain boundaries, one would need a definition of m and e in terms of the physical system, which the module does not provide.
THEOREM domainCost · IndisputableMonolith/Materials/Grain_Boundary_Energy_RS.lean
def domainCost (m e : ℝ) : ℝ := Jcost (m / e)
MODEL domainCost · IndisputableMonolith/Materials/Grain_Boundary_Energy_RS.lean
def domainCost (m e : ℝ) : ℝ := Jcost (m / e)
THEOREM domainCost_at_eq · IndisputableMonolith/Materials/Grain_Boundary_Energy_RS.lean
theorem domainCost_at_eq (r : ℝ) (h : r ≠ 0) : domainCost r r = 0 := by
unfold domainCost; rw [div_self h]; exact Jcost_unit0
THEOREM domainCost_nonneg · IndisputableMonolith/Materials/Grain_Boundary_Energy_RS.lean
theorem domainCost_nonneg (m e : ℝ) (hm : 0 < m) (he : 0 < e) : 0 ≤ domainCost m e := by
unfold domainCost; exact Jcost_nonneg (div_pos hm he)
THEOREM canonicalThreshold_pos · IndisputableMonolith/Materials/Grain_Boundary_Energy_RS.lean
theorem canonicalThreshold_pos : 0 < canonicalThreshold := by
unfold canonicalThreshold; linarith [phi_gt_onePointFive]
What this page does not claim
The numerical value 0.236 J/m² for steel is not a derived result. The module does not prove that grain boundary energy equals J(phi) times surface energy. The formal theorems hold for the cost function, not for any specific material.
Verify this page
Every tagged claim above names its theorem. To check one yourself rather than trust this page, elaborate the source module with Lean 4 and audit its axiom basis:
$ lake env lean IndisputableMonolith/Materials/Grain_Boundary_Energy_RS.lean
expected axiom basis: [propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound] (the Lean kernel's standard three; no RS-specific axioms)
A page whose claims cannot be reproduced this way does not ship. In production, every anchor links to the exact declaration in the public source release, and this block carries the build receipt for the page itself.
Derived articles
This page is generated by a question-recursion engine: the questions its answers raise become the next pages. The current agenda, with open targets marked red:
- What physical definitions of m and e would turn the template into a theorem about grain boundaries?
- How does the 0.118 factor compare with measured grain boundary to surface energy ratios across materials?
- Does the framework's cost function apply to other interface energies, such as stacking faults or twin boundaries?
MACHINE LAYER · GROUNDED CLAIM TABLE · CLICK TO EXPAND
THEOREM domainCost · IndisputableMonolith/Materials/Grain_Boundary_Energy_RS.lean
def domainCost (m e : ℝ) : ℝ := Jcost (m / e)The framework proves a unique dimensionless cost function J(x) = (x + 1/x)/2 - 1. domainCost · IndisputableMonolith/Materials/Grain_Boundary_Energy_RS.leanMODEL domainCost · IndisputableMonolith/Materials/Grain_Boundary_Energy_RS.lean
def domainCost (m e : ℝ) : ℝ := Jcost (m / e)The module sets the grain boundary energy to J(phi) times the surface energy gamma_s, which evaluates to 0.118 * gamma_s. domainCost · IndisputableMonolith/Materials/Grain_Boundary_Energy_RS.leanTHEOREM domainCost_at_eq · IndisputableMonolith/Materials/Grain_Boundary_Energy_RS.lean
theorem domainCost_at_eq (r : ℝ) (h : r ≠ 0) : domainCost r r = 0 := by unfold domainCost; rw [div_self h]; exact Jcost_unit0The cost vanishes when the two inputs are equal: domainCost r r = 0 for any nonzero r. domainCost_at_eq · IndisputableMonolith/Materials/Grain_Boundary_Energy_RS.leanTHEOREM domainCost_nonneg · IndisputableMonolith/Materials/Grain_Boundary_Energy_RS.lean
theorem domainCost_nonneg (m e : ℝ) (hm : 0 < m) (he : 0 < e) : 0 ≤ domainCost m e := by unfold domainCost; exact Jcost_nonneg (div_pos hm he)The cost is nonnegative for positive inputs. domainCost_nonneg · IndisputableMonolith/Materials/Grain_Boundary_Energy_RS.leanTHEOREM canonicalThreshold_pos · IndisputableMonolith/Materials/Grain_Boundary_Energy_RS.lean
theorem canonicalThreshold_pos : 0 < canonicalThreshold := by unfold canonicalThreshold; linarith [phi_gt_onePointFive]The threshold phi - 3/2 is positive. canonicalThreshold_pos · IndisputableMonolith/Materials/Grain_Boundary_Energy_RS.lean