Encyclopedia Masses Masses Electroweak Masses Cos2 Theta W Rs Eq
ARTICLE 5 claims 4 theorems 1 model
Masses Electroweak Masses Cos2 Theta W Rs Eq
A machine-checked identity expresses the electroweak mixing angle through the golden ratio, but the physics that connects them remains a model.
The Weinberg angle in RS
The Weinberg angle θ_W is the quantity in the standard model of particle physics that measures how much the Z boson and the photon mix when electroweak symmetry breaks. Its sine squared, sin²θ_W, is measured to be about 0.223. The Recognition Science (RS) framework defines this quantity as (3 − φ)/6, where φ is the golden ratio, and then defines cos²θ_W as 1 minus that value.
The declaration cos2_theta_W_rs_eq proves, in the machine-checked library of formal theorems, that this definition simplifies to (3 + φ)/6. This is a pure algebraic identity: it follows from the definitions by ring arithmetic, with no physical input. The same file proves that sin²θ_W lies between 0 and 1/2, and that cos²θ_W is positive, which are the bounds one expects for a valid mixing angle.
In Recognition Science, the Z boson mass is set at a specific rung of the mass ladder, giving m_Z = 2 × φ^51 / 10^6 MeV, and the W mass is defined as m_Z × cos(θ_W). The theorem wz_ratio_eq_cos states that the ratio w_pred / z_pred equals cos_theta_W_rs by construction. This is not a prediction of the ratio; it is a definitional choice that builds the Weinberg relation into the framework.
The framework's Z mass prediction lands in the interval (91075.09, 91075.10) MeV, and the file proves this lies within 0.13% of the PDG 2024 value of 91187.6 MeV. The W mass, derived from Z times the cosine, is therefore tied to the same golden-ratio structure. But the identification of sin²θ_W with (3 − φ)/6 is a definition, not a derived theorem; the file labels it as coming from the gauge embedding geometry without proving that geometry.
What the declaration does not claim is that the standard model's measured Weinberg angle has been derived from first principles. The identity cos²θ_W = (3 + φ)/6 is exact within the framework's definitions, but those definitions are chosen, not forced. The connection between the golden ratio and electroweak mixing remains a model choice, and the measured value is an empirical check, not a theorem.
THEOREM cos2_theta_W_rs_eq · IndisputableMonolith/Masses/ElectroweakMasses.lean
theorem cos2_theta_W_rs_eq : cos2_theta_W_rs = (3 + Constants.phi) / 6 := by
unfold cos2_theta_W_rs sin2_theta_W_rs; ring
MODEL sin2_theta_W_rs · IndisputableMonolith/Masses/ElectroweakMasses.lean
noncomputable def sin2_theta_W_rs : ℝ := (3 - Constants.phi) / 6
THEOREM z_mass_bounds · IndisputableMonolith/Masses/ElectroweakMasses.lean
/-- The Z boson mass prediction lies in (91075.09, 91075.10) MeV. -/
theorem z_mass_bounds :
(91075.09 : ℝ) < z_pred ∧ z_pred < (91075.10 : ℝ) := by
rw [z_pred_eq]
constructor
· rw [lt_div_iff₀ (by norm_num : (0 : ℝ) < 1000000)]
calc (91075.09 : ℝ) * 1000000 = (91075090000 : ℝ) := by norm_num
_ < 2 * (45537548334 : ℝ) := by norm_num
_ < 2 * Constants.phi ^ 51 := by nlinarith [phi51_gt]
· rw [div_lt_iff₀ (by norm_num : (0 : ℝ) < 1000000)]
calc 2 * Constants.phi ^ 51 < 2 * (45537549354 : ℝ) := by nlinarith [phi51_lt]
_ = (91075098708 : ℝ) := by norm_num
_ < (91075100000 : ℝ) := by norm_num
_ = (91075.10 : ℝ) * 1000000 := by norm_num
THEOREM z_relative_error · IndisputableMonolith/Masses/ElectroweakMasses.lean
/-- The Z boson prediction is within 0.13% of the PDG value. -/
theorem z_relative_error :
|z_pred - m_Z_exp| / m_Z_exp < 0.0013 := by
have hb := z_mass_bounds
have hexp_pos : (0 : ℝ) < m_Z_exp := by unfold m_Z_exp; norm_num
rw [div_lt_iff₀ hexp_pos, abs_lt]
unfold m_Z_exp
constructor <;> nlinarith [hb.1, hb.2]
THEOREM wz_ratio_eq_cos · IndisputableMonolith/Masses/ElectroweakMasses.lean
/-- The W/Z mass ratio equals cos(θ_W) by construction. -/
theorem wz_ratio_eq_cos : w_pred / z_pred = cos_theta_W_rs := by
unfold w_pred
have hzne : z_pred ≠ 0 := ne_of_gt (by linarith [z_mass_bounds.1])
exact mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ hzne
What this page does not claim
The measured Weinberg angle has been derived from first principles. The identification of sin²θ_W with (3 − φ)/6 is a theorem rather than a definition. The W/Z mass ratio is a prediction; it is fixed by construction.
Verify this page
Every tagged claim above names its theorem. To check one yourself rather than trust this page, elaborate the source module with Lean 4 and audit its axiom basis:
$ lake env lean IndisputableMonolith/Masses/ElectroweakMasses.lean
expected axiom basis: [propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound] (the Lean kernel's standard three; no RS-specific axioms)
A page whose claims cannot be reproduced this way does not ship. In production, every anchor links to the exact declaration in the public source release, and this block carries the build receipt for the page itself.
Derived articles
This page is generated by a question-recursion engine: the questions its answers raise become the next pages. The current agenda, with open targets marked red:
- What physical mechanism, if any, forces sin²θ_W to equal (3 − φ)/6?
- How does the gauge embedding geometry from which the Weinberg angle is said to derive get formalized?
- Does the golden-ratio structure extend to other standard model parameters beyond the electroweak sector?
- What is the experimental uncertainty on the PDG 2024 Weinberg angle, and how does it compare to the RS value?
MACHINE LAYER · GROUNDED CLAIM TABLE · CLICK TO EXPAND
THEOREM cos2_theta_W_rs_eq · IndisputableMonolith/Masses/ElectroweakMasses.lean
theorem cos2_theta_W_rs_eq : cos2_theta_W_rs = (3 + Constants.phi) / 6 := by unfold cos2_theta_W_rs sin2_theta_W_rs; ringThe declaration cos2_theta_W_rs_eq proves that cos²θ_W equals (3 + φ)/6, where φ is the golden ratio. cos2_theta_W_rs_eq · IndisputableMonolith/Masses/ElectroweakMasses.leanMODEL sin2_theta_W_rs · IndisputableMonolith/Masses/ElectroweakMasses.lean
noncomputable def sin2_theta_W_rs : ℝ := (3 - Constants.phi) / 6The framework defines sin²θ_W as (3 − φ)/6. sin2_theta_W_rs · IndisputableMonolith/Masses/ElectroweakMasses.leanTHEOREM z_mass_bounds · IndisputableMonolith/Masses/ElectroweakMasses.lean
/-- The Z boson mass prediction lies in (91075.09, 91075.10) MeV. -/ theorem z_mass_bounds : (91075.09 : ℝ) < z_pred ∧ z_pred < (91075.10 : ℝ) := by rw [z_pred_eq] constructor · rw [lt_div_iff₀ (by norm_num : (0 : ℝ) < 1000000)] calc (91075.09 : ℝ) * 1000000 = (91075090000 : ℝ) := by norm_num _ < 2 * (45537548334 : ℝ) := by norm_num _ < 2 * Constants.phi ^ 51 := by nlinarith [phi51_gt] · rw [div_lt_iff₀ (by norm_num : (0 : ℝ) < 1000000)] calc 2 * Constants.phi ^ 51 < 2 * (45537549354 : ℝ) := by nlinarith [phi51_lt] _ = (91075098708 : ℝ) := by norm_num _ < (91075100000 : ℝ) := by norm_num _ = (91075.10 : ℝ) * 1000000 := by norm_numThe Z boson mass prediction lies in the interval (91075.09, 91075.10) MeV. z_mass_bounds · IndisputableMonolith/Masses/ElectroweakMasses.leanTHEOREM z_relative_error · IndisputableMonolith/Masses/ElectroweakMasses.lean
/-- The Z boson prediction is within 0.13% of the PDG value. -/ theorem z_relative_error : |z_pred - m_Z_exp| / m_Z_exp < 0.0013 := by have hb := z_mass_bounds have hexp_pos : (0 : ℝ) < m_Z_exp := by unfold m_Z_exp; norm_num rw [div_lt_iff₀ hexp_pos, abs_lt] unfold m_Z_exp constructor <;> nlinarith [hb.1, hb.2]The framework proves the Z mass prediction is within 0.13% of the PDG 2024 value. z_relative_error · IndisputableMonolith/Masses/ElectroweakMasses.leanTHEOREM wz_ratio_eq_cos · IndisputableMonolith/Masses/ElectroweakMasses.lean
/-- The W/Z mass ratio equals cos(θ_W) by construction. -/ theorem wz_ratio_eq_cos : w_pred / z_pred = cos_theta_W_rs := by unfold w_pred have hzne : z_pred ≠ 0 := ne_of_gt (by linarith [z_mass_bounds.1]) exact mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ hzneThe ratio w_pred / z_pred equals cos_theta_W_rs by construction. wz_ratio_eq_cos · IndisputableMonolith/Masses/ElectroweakMasses.lean