Encyclopedia Masses Masses Channel Cost Boundary Channel Cost Shift Rational Pos Iff
ARTICLE 3 claims 3 theorems
Masses Channel Cost Boundary Channel Cost Shift Rational Pos Iff
A theorem in the Recognition Science library classifies exactly when a deformed mass-channel cost is a positive rational number, and it does not claim that any particular deformation is the real one.
The shift theorem
The declaration channel_cost_shift_rational_pos_iff is a theorem in the Recognition Science framework's machine-checked library of formal theorems. It concerns the golden ratio φ and a function J that the framework uses to price recognition events. The statement is about a family of costs obtained by shifting a base coefficient by k rungs per channel. The theorem says, for any integer k, that the shifted cost J(φ^(2+k)) is a positive rational number if and only if k is even and k is not equal to -2.
This is a precise classification. For example, when k = 0, the cost is J(φ²) = 1/2, a positive rational. When k = 2, the cost is J(φ⁴) = 5/2, also rational. When k = 1, the cost involves √5 and is irrational. The excluded case k = -2 gives J(φ⁰) = J(1) = 0, which is rational but not positive. The theorem also proves a minimality property: among all positive rational costs in this family, the smallest is 1/2, attained only at k = 0 and its mirror k = -4, a consequence of the symmetry J(x) = J(x⁻¹).
In the framework's account, this theorem does not establish that any particular shift is the correct description of nature. The library proves the classification and the minimality, but it does not prove that a channel's cost must be a positive rational on this ladder, nor that an elementary coupling pays the minimal cost. Those are premises. The theorem sharpens the missing premise from an exact number to a qualitative selection principle: if a channel cost is a positive rational on the golden ladder, minimal among such, and directed upward, then the shift is k = 0. The proof of that conditional is banked as rational_minimal_channel_cost_closes_base, but the antecedent remains open.
THEOREM channel_cost_shift_rational_pos_iff · IndisputableMonolith/Masses/ChannelCostBoundary.lean
/-- **THEOREM (the rational positive shifts are exactly the even nonzero ones).** The
deformed per-channel cost `J(φ^{2+k})` is a positive rational iff `k` is even and
`k ≠ -2`. So requiring a rational channel cost halves the deformation family to the even
shifts (the odd shifts are irrational; `k = -2` is the zero-cost `φ⁰`). -/
theorem channel_cost_shift_rational_pos_iff (k : ℤ) :
((∃ q : ℚ, Cost.Jcost (phi ^ (2 + k)) = (q : ℝ)) ∧ 0 < Cost.Jcost (phi ^ (2 + k)))
↔ (Even k ∧ k ≠ -2) := by
rw [jcost_phi_zpow_natAbs]
set n := (2 + k).natAbs with hn
have hrat : (∃ q : ℚ, Cost.Jcost (phi ^ (n : ℕ)) = (q : ℝ)) ↔ n = 0 ∨ Even n :=
jcost_phi_pow_rational_iff n
have hpos : 0 < Cost.Jcost (phi ^ (n : ℕ)) ↔ n ≠ 0 := by
constructor
· intro hp h0
rw [h0, pow_zero, Cost.Jcost_unit0] at hp
exact lt_irrefl _ hp
· intro h0
have hn1 : 1 ≤ n := by omega
have h1 : (1 : ℝ) < phi ^ n := by
have := pow_lt_pow_right₀ Constants.one_lt_phi hn1
rwa [pow_zero] at this
have hlt := Foundation.jcost_strictMono_one_lt (le_refl (1 : ℝ)) h1
rwa [Cost.Jcost_unit0] at hlt
rw [hrat, hpos]
constructor
· rintro ⟨(h0 | hE), hne⟩
· omega
· have hE' : Even (2 + k) := (even_natAbs_iff (2 + k)).1 hE
have hk2 : k ≠ -2 := by
intro hk2
apply hne
rw [hn, hk2]
decide
rcases hE' with ⟨a, ha⟩
exact ⟨⟨a - 1, by omega⟩, hk2⟩
· rintro ⟨hEk, hk2⟩
have hE' : Even (2 + k) := by
rcases hEk with ⟨a, ha⟩
exact ⟨a + 1, by omega⟩
have hnE : Even n := (even_natAbs_iff (2 + k)).2 hE'
have hn0 : n ≠ 0 := by
intro h0
rw [hn, Int.natAbs_eq_zero] at h0
omega
exact ⟨Or.inr hnE, hn0⟩
THEOREM channel_cost_shift_minimal · IndisputableMonolith/Masses/ChannelCostBoundary.lean
/-- **THEOREM (the canonical shift and its mirror are the unique minima).** Among shifts
with positive rational channel cost, the cost is at least `1/2`, with equality iff
`k = 0` (the canonical table) or `k = -4` (the mirror: `φ^{-2}` costs the same as `φ²`
by `J(x) = J(x⁻¹)`). The upward, mass-lifting choice is `k = 0` alone. -/
theorem channel_cost_shift_minimal (k : ℤ)
(hrat : ∃ q : ℚ, Cost.Jcost (phi ^ (2 + k)) = (q : ℝ))
(hpos : 0 < Cost.Jcost (phi ^ (2 + k))) :
1 / 2 ≤ Cost.Jcost (phi ^ (2 + k))
∧ (Cost.Jcost (phi ^ (2 + k)) = 1 / 2 → k = 0 ∨ k = -4) := by
rw [jcost_phi_zpow_natAbs] at hrat hpos ⊢
set n := (2 + k).natAbs with hn
have hn1 : 1 ≤ n := by
by_contra h0
push_neg at h0
have hz : n = 0 := by omega
rw [hz, pow_zero, Cost.Jcost_unit0] at hpos
exact lt_irrefl _ hpos
have hmin := jcost_phi_sq_minimal n hn1 hrat
refine ⟨hmin.1, fun heq => ?_⟩
have hn2 : n = 2 := hmin.2 heq
rw [hn] at hn2
have h2 : (2 + k).natAbs = ((2 : ℤ)).natAbs := hn2
rw [Int.natAbs_eq_natAbs_iff] at h2
rcases h2 with h | h <;> omega
THEOREM channel_cost_boundary · IndisputableMonolith/Masses/ChannelCostBoundary.lean
/-- **THEOREM (channel cost is kernel-contingent, stratified).** One conjunction:
1. every integer per-channel shift meets the table's entire banked structure (torsion
factorization, channel linearity, the ν3 anomaly);
2. nonzero shifts are observably distinct — the cost is contingent, not gauge;
3. the shifts keeping the cost a positive rational are exactly the even nonzero ones;
4. among those, the minimum `1/2` is attained exactly at the canonical `k = 0` and its
cost mirror `k = -4`;
5. conditional closure: a per-channel rung count that is positive, rational, and minimal
among such is forced to be `2`, which closes the base rule.
So the kernel does not price a gauge channel; but the price, *if* it is a minimal
positive rational golden cost directed upward, is forced to be the `φ²`-step. -/
theorem channel_cost_boundary :
(∀ k : ℤ, ∀ f : Fermion,
shiftedRungs k f
= (2 + k) * activeChannelClasses f + Integers.tau (genOf f).val
+ (if f = Fermion.nu3 then 2 else 0))
∧ (∀ k : ℤ, k ≠ 0 → ∀ Z : ℤ,
predictAt .Lepton (deformedTotal k Fermion.e) Z
≠ predictAt .Lepton (deformedTotal 0 Fermion.e) Z)
∧ (∀ k : ℤ,
((∃ q : ℚ, Cost.Jcost (phi ^ (2 + k)) = (q : ℝ))
∧ 0 < Cost.Jcost (phi ^ (2 + k)))
↔ (Even k ∧ k ≠ -2))
∧ (∀ k : ℤ,
(∃ q : ℚ, Cost.Jcost (phi ^ (2 + k)) = (q : ℝ)) →
0 < Cost.Jcost (phi ^ (2 + k)) →
1 / 2 ≤ Cost.Jcost (phi ^ (2 + k))
∧ (Cost.Jcost (phi ^ (2 + k)) = 1 / 2 → k = 0 ∨ k = -4))
∧ (∀ k : ℕ, 1 ≤ k →
(∃ q : ℚ, Cost.Jcost (phi ^ k) = (q : ℝ)) →
(∀ m : ℕ, 1 ≤ m → (∃ q : ℚ, Cost.Jcost (phi ^ m) = (q : ℝ)) → k ≤ m) →
∀ f : Fermion, (k : ℤ) * activeChannelClasses f = 2 * activeChannelClasses f) :=
⟨shiftedRungs_factors,
fun k hk Z => baseRule_predictions_differ k hk Z,
channel_cost_shift_rational_pos_iff,
channel_cost_shift_minimal,
fun k hk hrat hmin f => rational_minimal_channel_cost_closes_base k hk hrat hmin f⟩
What this page does not claim
This theorem does not claim that any particular shift k is the one realized in nature. This theorem does not claim that the cost of a channel must be rational, only classifies when it is. This theorem does not prove the base rule coefficient 2; it only proves a conditional that would close it given an unproved premise.
Verify this page
Every tagged claim above names its theorem. To check one yourself rather than trust this page, elaborate the source module with Lean 4 and audit its axiom basis:
$ lake env lean IndisputableMonolith/Masses/ChannelCostBoundary.lean
expected axiom basis: [propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound] (the Lean kernel's standard three; no RS-specific axioms)
A page whose claims cannot be reproduced this way does not ship. In production, every anchor links to the exact declaration in the public source release, and this block carries the build receipt for the page itself.
Derived articles
This page is generated by a question-recursion engine: the questions its answers raise become the next pages. The current agenda, with open targets marked red:
- What physical principle would justify the premise that a channel cost is a positive rational on the golden ladder?
- What would it mean for the framework if the minimal positive rational cost were not the one selected by nature?
- How does the shift theorem relate to the unproved premise in RungBaseBoundary that each coupled gauge channel costs one φ²-step?
MACHINE LAYER · GROUNDED CLAIM TABLE · CLICK TO EXPAND
THEOREM channel_cost_shift_rational_pos_iff · IndisputableMonolith/Masses/ChannelCostBoundary.lean
/-- **THEOREM (the rational positive shifts are exactly the even nonzero ones).** The deformed per-channel cost `J(φ^{2+k})` is a positive rational iff `k` is even and `k ≠ -2`. So requiring a rational channel cost halves the deformation family to the even shifts (the odd shifts are irrational; `k = -2` is the zero-cost `φ⁰`). -/ theorem channel_cost_shift_rational_pos_iff (k : ℤ) : ((∃ q : ℚ, Cost.Jcost (phi ^ (2 + k)) = (q : ℝ)) ∧ 0 < Cost.Jcost (phi ^ (2 + k))) ↔ (Even k ∧ k ≠ -2) := by rw [jcost_phi_zpow_natAbs] set n := (2 + k).natAbs with hn have hrat : (∃ q : ℚ, Cost.Jcost (phi ^ (n : ℕ)) = (q : ℝ)) ↔ n = 0 ∨ Even n := jcost_phi_pow_rational_iff n have hpos : 0 < Cost.Jcost (phi ^ (n : ℕ)) ↔ n ≠ 0 := by constructor · intro hp h0 rw [h0, pow_zero, Cost.Jcost_unit0] at hp exact lt_irrefl _ hp · intro h0 have hn1 : 1 ≤ n := by omega have h1 : (1 : ℝ) < phi ^ n := by have := pow_lt_pow_right₀ Constants.one_lt_phi hn1 rwa [pow_zero] at this have hlt := Foundation.jcost_strictMono_one_lt (le_refl (1 : ℝ)) h1 rwa [Cost.Jcost_unit0] at hlt rw [hrat, hpos] constructor · rintro ⟨(h0 | hE), hne⟩ · omega · have hE' : Even (2 + k) := (even_natAbs_iff (2 + k)).1 hE have hk2 : k ≠ -2 := by intro hk2 apply hne rw [hn, hk2] decide rcases hE' with ⟨a, ha⟩ exact ⟨⟨a - 1, by omega⟩, hk2⟩ · rintro ⟨hEk, hk2⟩ have hE' : Even (2 + k) := by rcases hEk with ⟨a, ha⟩ exact ⟨a + 1, by omega⟩ have hnE : Even n := (even_natAbs_iff (2 + k)).2 hE' have hn0 : n ≠ 0 := by intro h0 rw [hn, Int.natAbs_eq_zero] at h0 omega exact ⟨Or.inr hnE, hn0⟩For any integer k, the shifted cost J(φ^(2+k)) is a positive rational number if and only if k is even and k is not equal to -2. channel_cost_shift_rational_pos_iff · IndisputableMonolith/Masses/ChannelCostBoundary.leanTHEOREM channel_cost_shift_minimal · IndisputableMonolith/Masses/ChannelCostBoundary.lean
/-- **THEOREM (the canonical shift and its mirror are the unique minima).** Among shifts with positive rational channel cost, the cost is at least `1/2`, with equality iff `k = 0` (the canonical table) or `k = -4` (the mirror: `φ^{-2}` costs the same as `φ²` by `J(x) = J(x⁻¹)`). The upward, mass-lifting choice is `k = 0` alone. -/ theorem channel_cost_shift_minimal (k : ℤ) (hrat : ∃ q : ℚ, Cost.Jcost (phi ^ (2 + k)) = (q : ℝ)) (hpos : 0 < Cost.Jcost (phi ^ (2 + k))) : 1 / 2 ≤ Cost.Jcost (phi ^ (2 + k)) ∧ (Cost.Jcost (phi ^ (2 + k)) = 1 / 2 → k = 0 ∨ k = -4) := by rw [jcost_phi_zpow_natAbs] at hrat hpos ⊢ set n := (2 + k).natAbs with hn have hn1 : 1 ≤ n := by by_contra h0 push_neg at h0 have hz : n = 0 := by omega rw [hz, pow_zero, Cost.Jcost_unit0] at hpos exact lt_irrefl _ hpos have hmin := jcost_phi_sq_minimal n hn1 hrat refine ⟨hmin.1, fun heq => ?_⟩ have hn2 : n = 2 := hmin.2 heq rw [hn] at hn2 have h2 : (2 + k).natAbs = ((2 : ℤ)).natAbs := hn2 rw [Int.natAbs_eq_natAbs_iff] at h2 rcases h2 with h | h <;> omegaThe smallest positive rational cost in this family is 1/2, attained only at k = 0 and its mirror k = -4. channel_cost_shift_minimal · IndisputableMonolith/Masses/ChannelCostBoundary.leanTHEOREM channel_cost_boundary · IndisputableMonolith/Masses/ChannelCostBoundary.lean
/-- **THEOREM (channel cost is kernel-contingent, stratified).** One conjunction: 1. every integer per-channel shift meets the table's entire banked structure (torsion factorization, channel linearity, the ν3 anomaly); 2. nonzero shifts are observably distinct — the cost is contingent, not gauge; 3. the shifts keeping the cost a positive rational are exactly the even nonzero ones; 4. among those, the minimum `1/2` is attained exactly at the canonical `k = 0` and its cost mirror `k = -4`; 5. conditional closure: a per-channel rung count that is positive, rational, and minimal among such is forced to be `2`, which closes the base rule. So the kernel does not price a gauge channel; but the price, *if* it is a minimal positive rational golden cost directed upward, is forced to be the `φ²`-step. -/ theorem channel_cost_boundary : (∀ k : ℤ, ∀ f : Fermion, shiftedRungs k f = (2 + k) * activeChannelClasses f + Integers.tau (genOf f).val + (if f = Fermion.nu3 then 2 else 0)) ∧ (∀ k : ℤ, k ≠ 0 → ∀ Z : ℤ, predictAt .Lepton (deformedTotal k Fermion.e) Z ≠ predictAt .Lepton (deformedTotal 0 Fermion.e) Z) ∧ (∀ k : ℤ, ((∃ q : ℚ, Cost.Jcost (phi ^ (2 + k)) = (q : ℝ)) ∧ 0 < Cost.Jcost (phi ^ (2 + k))) ↔ (Even k ∧ k ≠ -2)) ∧ (∀ k : ℤ, (∃ q : ℚ, Cost.Jcost (phi ^ (2 + k)) = (q : ℝ)) → 0 < Cost.Jcost (phi ^ (2 + k)) → 1 / 2 ≤ Cost.Jcost (phi ^ (2 + k)) ∧ (Cost.Jcost (phi ^ (2 + k)) = 1 / 2 → k = 0 ∨ k = -4)) ∧ (∀ k : ℕ, 1 ≤ k → (∃ q : ℚ, Cost.Jcost (phi ^ k) = (q : ℝ)) → (∀ m : ℕ, 1 ≤ m → (∃ q : ℚ, Cost.Jcost (phi ^ m) = (q : ℝ)) → k ≤ m) → ∀ f : Fermion, (k : ℤ) * activeChannelClasses f = 2 * activeChannelClasses f) := ⟨shiftedRungs_factors, fun k hk Z => baseRule_predictions_differ k hk Z, channel_cost_shift_rational_pos_iff, channel_cost_shift_minimal, fun k hk hrat hmin f => rational_minimal_channel_cost_closes_base k hk hrat hmin f⟩The theorem does not establish that any particular shift is the correct description of nature; it sharpens the missing premise to a qualitative selection principle. channel_cost_boundary · IndisputableMonolith/Masses/ChannelCostBoundary.lean