Encyclopedia Information Information Quantum Channel Capacity From Phi Correction Le Inv
ARTICLE 4 claims 2 theorems 1 model
Information Quantum Channel Capacity From Phi Correction Le Inv
A machine-checked proof shows a quantum channel capacity correction stays bounded by a simple inverse law, tying information theory to the golden ratio.
The finite-N correction
In classical information theory, the Shannon capacity of a channel with signal-to-noise ratio S/N is C = log₂(1 + S/N). The quantum analog, for entanglement-assisted or coherent-information communication, carries an additional finite-size correction. The Recognition Science framework models this correction as 1/(φ·N) per input symbol, where φ is the golden ratio and N is the number of input symbols. This is a definitional choice, a model, not a derived result.
The declaration correction_le_inv proves a bound on that correction: for any positive N, the correction 1/(φ·N) is at most 1/N. Since φ is approximately 1.618, the correction is always smaller than the plain inverse count. The proof is machine-checked in the framework's library of formal theorems, with no unproved assumptions. It also establishes the correction is strictly positive and strictly decreasing as N grows, tending to zero in the large-N limit.
These properties assemble into a certificate, a packaged guarantee that the correction behaves as a finite-size effect should: positive, shrinking, and bounded by the inverse symbol count. The framework's structural prediction goes further, claiming the entanglement-assisted-to-classical capacity ratio for an N-symbol block is 1 + 1/(φ·N), and that adjacent-N ratios differ by (N+1)/N · 1/φ to leading order. The correction vanishes as 1/N, not 1/N², which would distinguish it from a classical-only model with zero finite-N correction. This prediction is a hypothesis, not a theorem; it awaits empirical or experimental test.
What correction_le_inv does not claim is equally important. It does not prove the capacity formula itself, nor that the golden ratio correction is physically realized. It only bounds a model's correction term. The bound is a theorem about a definition, so the whole statement carries the MODEL tag. The golden ratio enters through the framework's constants, not through any derivation in this declaration.
THEOREM correction_le_inv · IndisputableMonolith/Information/QuantumChannelCapacityFromPhi.lean
/-- Correction tends to 0 as `N → ∞` (statement form using single
positive `N`; the limit is the standard `1/N → 0`). -/
theorem correction_le_inv {N : ℕ} (hN : 0 < N) :
correction N hN ≤ 1 / (N : ℝ) := by
unfold correction
have hphi_gt_one : (1 : ℝ) < phi := by
have := Constants.phi_gt_onePointFive; linarith
have hphi : 0 < phi := Constants.phi_pos
have hNpos : (0 : ℝ) < (N : ℝ) := by exact_mod_cast hN
have hphiN : 0 < phi * (N : ℝ) := by positivity
have hN_le : (N : ℝ) ≤ phi * (N : ℝ) := by
have : (1 : ℝ) * (N : ℝ) ≤ phi * (N : ℝ) :=
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (le_of_lt hphi_gt_one) (le_of_lt hNpos)
simpa using this
exact one_div_le_one_div_of_le hNpos hN_le
THEOREM correction_pos · correction_strictly_decreasing · IndisputableMonolith/Information/QuantumChannelCapacityFromPhi.lean
/-- Correction is strictly positive at every positive `N`. -/
theorem correction_pos (N : ℕ) (hN : 0 < N) : 0 < correction N hN := by
unfold correction
have hphi : 0 < phi := Constants.phi_pos
have hNpos : (0 : ℝ) < (N : ℝ) := by exact_mod_cast hN
positivity
/-- Correction strictly decreases with `N` (from `N` to `N+1`). -/
theorem correction_strictly_decreasing (N : ℕ) (hN : 0 < N) :
correction (N + 1) (Nat.succ_pos _) < correction N hN := by
unfold correction
have hphi : 0 < phi := Constants.phi_pos
have hNpos : (0 : ℝ) < (N : ℝ) := by exact_mod_cast hN
have hN1pos : (0 : ℝ) < ((N + 1 : ℕ) : ℝ) := by exact_mod_cast Nat.succ_pos _
have hphiN_pos : (0 : ℝ) < phi * (N : ℝ) := by positivity
have hphiN1_pos : (0 : ℝ) < phi * ((N + 1 : ℕ) : ℝ) := by positivity
have hphi_le_strict : phi * (N : ℝ) < phi * ((N + 1 : ℕ) : ℝ) := by
apply mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left ?_ hphi
exact_mod_cast Nat.lt_succ_self N
exact one_div_lt_one_div_of_lt hphiN_pos hphi_le_strict
MODEL correction · IndisputableMonolith/Information/QuantumChannelCapacityFromPhi.lean
/-- The φ-ladder finite-N correction factor for quantum channel
capacity at input-symbol-count `N`. -/
def correction (N : ℕ) (hN : 0 < N) : ℝ := 1 / (phi * (N : ℝ))
HYPOTHESIS QuantumChannelCapacityCert · IndisputableMonolith/Information/QuantumChannelCapacityFromPhi.lean
structure QuantumChannelCapacityCert where
correction_pos : ∀ {N : ℕ} (hN : 0 < N), 0 < correction N hN
strictly_decreasing :
∀ (N : ℕ) (hN : 0 < N),
correction (N + 1) (Nat.succ_pos _) < correction N hN
bounded_by_inv :
∀ {N : ℕ} (hN : 0 < N), correction N hN ≤ 1 / (N : ℝ)
What this page does not claim
The declaration does not prove the capacity formula itself, only a bound on a model's correction term. The golden ratio correction is not derived from first principles in this declaration; it is a definitional choice. The structural prediction about the capacity ratio is a hypothesis awaiting test, not a proved theorem.
Verify this page
Every tagged claim above names its theorem. To check one yourself rather than trust this page, elaborate the source module with Lean 4 and audit its axiom basis:
$ lake env lean IndisputableMonolith/Information/QuantumChannelCapacityFromPhi.lean
expected axiom basis: [propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound] (the Lean kernel's standard three; no RS-specific axioms)
A page whose claims cannot be reproduced this way does not ship. In production, every anchor links to the exact declaration in the public source release, and this block carries the build receipt for the page itself.
Derived articles
This page is generated by a question-recursion engine: the questions its answers raise become the next pages. The current agenda, with open targets marked red:
- How would an experiment distinguish the 1/N correction from a classical-only model with zero finite-N correction?
- What physical channel would realize the entanglement-assisted-to-classical capacity ratio predicted here?
- Does the golden ratio correction appear in other information-theoretic limits within the framework?
MACHINE LAYER · GROUNDED CLAIM TABLE · CLICK TO EXPAND
THEOREM correction_le_inv · IndisputableMonolith/Information/QuantumChannelCapacityFromPhi.lean
/-- Correction tends to 0 as `N → ∞` (statement form using single positive `N`; the limit is the standard `1/N → 0`). -/ theorem correction_le_inv {N : ℕ} (hN : 0 < N) : correction N hN ≤ 1 / (N : ℝ) := by unfold correction have hphi_gt_one : (1 : ℝ) < phi := by have := Constants.phi_gt_onePointFive; linarith have hphi : 0 < phi := Constants.phi_pos have hNpos : (0 : ℝ) < (N : ℝ) := by exact_mod_cast hN have hphiN : 0 < phi * (N : ℝ) := by positivity have hN_le : (N : ℝ) ≤ phi * (N : ℝ) := by have : (1 : ℝ) * (N : ℝ) ≤ phi * (N : ℝ) := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (le_of_lt hphi_gt_one) (le_of_lt hNpos) simpa using this exact one_div_le_one_div_of_le hNpos hN_leThe declaration correction_le_inv proves a bound on that correction: for any positive N, the correction 1/(φ·N) is at most 1/N. correction_le_inv · IndisputableMonolith/Information/QuantumChannelCapacityFromPhi.leanTHEOREM correction_pos · correction_strictly_decreasing · IndisputableMonolith/Information/QuantumChannelCapacityFromPhi.lean
/-- Correction is strictly positive at every positive `N`. -/ theorem correction_pos (N : ℕ) (hN : 0 < N) : 0 < correction N hN := by unfold correction have hphi : 0 < phi := Constants.phi_pos have hNpos : (0 : ℝ) < (N : ℝ) := by exact_mod_cast hN positivity/-- Correction strictly decreases with `N` (from `N` to `N+1`). -/ theorem correction_strictly_decreasing (N : ℕ) (hN : 0 < N) : correction (N + 1) (Nat.succ_pos _) < correction N hN := by unfold correction have hphi : 0 < phi := Constants.phi_pos have hNpos : (0 : ℝ) < (N : ℝ) := by exact_mod_cast hN have hN1pos : (0 : ℝ) < ((N + 1 : ℕ) : ℝ) := by exact_mod_cast Nat.succ_pos _ have hphiN_pos : (0 : ℝ) < phi * (N : ℝ) := by positivity have hphiN1_pos : (0 : ℝ) < phi * ((N + 1 : ℕ) : ℝ) := by positivity have hphi_le_strict : phi * (N : ℝ) < phi * ((N + 1 : ℕ) : ℝ) := by apply mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left ?_ hphi exact_mod_cast Nat.lt_succ_self N exact one_div_lt_one_div_of_lt hphiN_pos hphi_le_strictIt also establishes the correction is strictly positive and strictly decreasing as N grows. correction_pos · correction_strictly_decreasing · IndisputableMonolith/Information/QuantumChannelCapacityFromPhi.leanMODEL correction · IndisputableMonolith/Information/QuantumChannelCapacityFromPhi.lean
/-- The φ-ladder finite-N correction factor for quantum channel capacity at input-symbol-count `N`. -/ def correction (N : ℕ) (hN : 0 < N) : ℝ := 1 / (phi * (N : ℝ))The framework models this correction as 1/(φ·N) per input symbol. correction · IndisputableMonolith/Information/QuantumChannelCapacityFromPhi.leanHYPOTHESIS QuantumChannelCapacityCert · IndisputableMonolith/Information/QuantumChannelCapacityFromPhi.lean
structure QuantumChannelCapacityCert where correction_pos : ∀ {N : ℕ} (hN : 0 < N), 0 < correction N hN strictly_decreasing : ∀ (N : ℕ) (hN : 0 < N), correction (N + 1) (Nat.succ_pos _) < correction N hN bounded_by_inv : ∀ {N : ℕ} (hN : 0 < N), correction N hN ≤ 1 / (N : ℝ)The framework's structural prediction goes further, claiming the entanglement-assisted-to-classical capacity ratio for an N-symbol block is 1 + 1/(φ·N). QuantumChannelCapacityCert · IndisputableMonolith/Information/QuantumChannelCapacityFromPhi.lean