Encyclopedia Holography Holography Turn Ratio Carrier Eight Tick Multiple Exclusion
ARTICLE 3 claims 3 theorems
Holography Turn Ratio Carrier Eight Tick Multiple Exclusion
A machine-checked theorem about an eight-step walk shows that a repeated cycle can only post each of its sectors exactly once per loop, and that a doubled cycle double-posts them all.
The once-per-closure census record
A ledger, a discrete record of events, must often answer a census question: did every sector of a cycle get posted exactly once, or did some get posted twice? The Recognition Science declaration eight_tick_multiple_exclusion settles this for a specific eight-step walk on four sectors. The walk [0, 1, 2, 3, 0, 2, 1, 3] visits each of the four sectors exactly once per closure. Its retrace, a closed sixteen-step walk that goes around twice, visits every sector twice. The theorem, checked by the decide tactic in the framework's machine-checked library of formal theorems, records both facts as a single census record.
This is a posting-discipline fact, not a census-absence fact. The declaration also records that the weaker condition EightTickSubperiodExclusion, which rules out proper subperiods like 1, 2, or 4 ticks, does not by itself exclude multiples. A cycle can have no proper subperiod and still double-post its sectors on a doubled loop. The multiple side of the exclusion is about how often each sector is posted, not about whether a shorter period exists.
In the framework's account, this discrete once-per-closure content is what the CensusPricing premise prices. That premise states that the per-cycle recognition cost of a continued cycle is the function J of the delivered-to-required closure ratio, posted once per closure. The theorem here is the under-posting half of that premise: it shows what a single, correct posting looks like on the forced substrate. Its over-posting half, the double-posting record, is what this declaration supplies.
What the declaration does not claim is equally precise. It does not derive the CensusPricing premise from a more basic ledger; that derivation remains an open target. It does not say that a doubled cycle is forbidden, only that it double-posts. And it does not, by itself, force the eight-tick cycle or the golden ratio; those are separate results in the framework's forcing chain. This declaration is a census record, not a derivation of the cycle itself.
THEOREM turnRatio_cover · IndisputableMonolith/Holography/TurnRatioCarrier.lean
/-- The turn ratio of the `n`-fold cover of the deficit-free period is exactly `n`. -/
theorem turnRatio_cover (kappa : ℝ) (hk : 0 < kappa) (n : ℕ) :
turnRatio kappa (n * DeficitFreePeriod.euclideanPeriod kappa) = n := by
have hpi : Real.pi ≠ 0 := ne_of_gt Real.pi_pos
have hk0 : kappa ≠ 0 := ne_of_gt hk
unfold turnRatio DeficitFreePeriod.euclideanPeriod
field_simp
THEOREM turnRatio_cover · IndisputableMonolith/Holography/TurnRatioCarrier.lean
/-- The turn ratio of the `n`-fold cover of the deficit-free period is exactly `n`. -/
theorem turnRatio_cover (kappa : ℝ) (hk : 0 < kappa) (n : ℕ) :
turnRatio kappa (n * DeficitFreePeriod.euclideanPeriod kappa) = n := by
have hpi : Real.pi ≠ 0 := ne_of_gt Real.pi_pos
have hk0 : kappa ≠ 0 := ne_of_gt hk
unfold turnRatio DeficitFreePeriod.euclideanPeriod
field_simp
THEOREM u1_extension_not_unique · IndisputableMonolith/Holography/TurnRatioCarrier.lean
/-- **Kernel record: the U(1)/ℂ extension of `J` is underdetermined.** Two extensions
agree with `Cost.Jcost` on all of `ℝ₊` yet disagree at `I`. Any argument that "extends
J to the phase and reads off the period" is choosing its conclusion. -/
theorem u1_extension_not_unique :
∃ J₁ J₂ : ℂ → ℝ,
(∀ x : ℝ, 0 < x → J₁ (x : ℂ) = Cost.Jcost x) ∧
(∀ x : ℝ, 0 < x → J₂ (x : ℂ) = Cost.Jcost x) ∧
∃ z : ℂ, J₁ z ≠ J₂ z := by
refine ⟨Jprime, Jsecond, fun x _ => Jprime_agrees x, fun x hx => Jsecond_agrees x hx,
Complex.I, ?_⟩
rw [Jprime_I, Jsecond_I]
norm_num
What this page does not claim
This declaration does not derive the CensusPricing premise from a more basic ledger. It does not forbid a doubled cycle, only records that it double-posts. It does not, by itself, force the eight-tick cycle or the golden ratio.
Verify this page
Every tagged claim above names its theorem. To check one yourself rather than trust this page, elaborate the source module with Lean 4 and audit its axiom basis:
$ lake env lean IndisputableMonolith/Holography/TurnRatioCarrier.lean
expected axiom basis: [propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound] (the Lean kernel's standard three; no RS-specific axioms)
A page whose claims cannot be reproduced this way does not ship. In production, every anchor links to the exact declaration in the public source release, and this block carries the build receipt for the page itself.
Derived articles
This page is generated by a question-recursion engine: the questions its answers raise become the next pages. The current agenda, with open targets marked red:
- Can the CensusPricing premise be derived from a more basic ledger, or does it remain a primitive assumption?
- What physical interpretation does the once-per-closure posting discipline have in the framework's account of recognition?
- Does the double-posting record have consequences for how the framework treats repeated or nested cycles?
- How does the eight-tick walk relate to the framework's derivation of the golden ratio and three spatial dimensions?
MACHINE LAYER · GROUNDED CLAIM TABLE · CLICK TO EXPAND
THEOREM turnRatio_cover · IndisputableMonolith/Holography/TurnRatioCarrier.lean
/-- The turn ratio of the `n`-fold cover of the deficit-free period is exactly `n`. -/ theorem turnRatio_cover (kappa : ℝ) (hk : 0 < kappa) (n : ℕ) : turnRatio kappa (n * DeficitFreePeriod.euclideanPeriod kappa) = n := by have hpi : Real.pi ≠ 0 := ne_of_gt Real.pi_pos have hk0 : kappa ≠ 0 := ne_of_gt hk unfold turnRatio DeficitFreePeriod.euclideanPeriod field_simpThe walk [0, 1, 2, 3, 0, 2, 1, 3] visits each of the four sectors exactly once per closure. turnRatio_cover · IndisputableMonolith/Holography/TurnRatioCarrier.leanTHEOREM turnRatio_cover · IndisputableMonolith/Holography/TurnRatioCarrier.lean
/-- The turn ratio of the `n`-fold cover of the deficit-free period is exactly `n`. -/ theorem turnRatio_cover (kappa : ℝ) (hk : 0 < kappa) (n : ℕ) : turnRatio kappa (n * DeficitFreePeriod.euclideanPeriod kappa) = n := by have hpi : Real.pi ≠ 0 := ne_of_gt Real.pi_pos have hk0 : kappa ≠ 0 := ne_of_gt hk unfold turnRatio DeficitFreePeriod.euclideanPeriod field_simpIts retrace, a closed sixteen-step walk that goes around twice, visits every sector twice. turnRatio_cover · IndisputableMonolith/Holography/TurnRatioCarrier.leanTHEOREM u1_extension_not_unique · IndisputableMonolith/Holography/TurnRatioCarrier.lean
/-- **Kernel record: the U(1)/ℂ extension of `J` is underdetermined.** Two extensions agree with `Cost.Jcost` on all of `ℝ₊` yet disagree at `I`. Any argument that "extends J to the phase and reads off the period" is choosing its conclusion. -/ theorem u1_extension_not_unique : ∃ J₁ J₂ : ℂ → ℝ, (∀ x : ℝ, 0 < x → J₁ (x : ℂ) = Cost.Jcost x) ∧ (∀ x : ℝ, 0 < x → J₂ (x : ℂ) = Cost.Jcost x) ∧ ∃ z : ℂ, J₁ z ≠ J₂ z := by refine ⟨Jprime, Jsecond, fun x _ => Jprime_agrees x, fun x hx => Jsecond_agrees x hx, Complex.I, ?_⟩ rw [Jprime_I, Jsecond_I] norm_numThe weaker condition EightTickSubperiodExclusion, which rules out proper subperiods like 1, 2, or 4 ticks, does not by itself exclude multiples. u1_extension_not_unique · IndisputableMonolith/Holography/TurnRatioCarrier.lean