Encyclopedia Holography Holography Deficit Free Period Deficit Cost Pos Of Not Period
ARTICLE 4 claims 4 theorems
Holography Deficit Free Period Deficit Cost Pos Of Not Period
A simple cost formula, 1 minus the cosine of a phase error, decides exactly when a periodic return is perfect and when it falls short.
The deficit cost
In the Recognition Science framework, a ledger (a discrete record of events) tracks a repeating process by a phase angle. A perfect return means the phase comes back to its starting value. The framework defines the cost (the price of an imperfect return) as C(δ) = 1 − cos δ, where δ is the phase deficit, the amount by which the return misses perfect closure. This is the squared chord distance on a circle: the straight-line gap between the returned point and the starting point, halved. The formula is not chosen arbitrarily; it is the unique cost function forced by the framework's five plain conditions, applied to the circular carrier of the clock.
The theorem deficitCost_pos_of_not_period states a precise fact: if a phase deficit δ is not an integer multiple of 2π, then the cost is strictly positive. In symbols, if there is no integer n with δ = n·2π, then 0 < C(δ). This is a machine-checked proof in the framework's library of formal theorems. The companion theorem deficitCost_eq_zero_iff gives the exact converse: the cost vanishes if and only if δ is an integer multiple of 2π. Together they draw a sharp line: perfect returns happen exactly at multiples of the full circle, and every other return carries a positive price.
The theorem also supports a minimal-period result. For a process running at rate κ, the cost of a return after time T is C(κT). The set of positive times with zero cost has a least element, namely 2π/κ (euclideanPeriod_isLeast). This is the shortest time for a deficit-free return. The number 2π is not inserted by hand; it emerges as the smallest positive zero of the cost function itself, which is the unique J-form on the forced circular carrier.
In Recognition Science, this chain connects to a physics bridge. With two named model premises, the deficit-free period forces the saturating value S = 2πER for horizon entropy (bekenstein_saturation_from_deficit_free_period). The theorem deficitCost_pos_of_not_period itself does not make that bridge. It only establishes the positivity of the cost off the lattice. The bridge is conditional on the premises HorizonRate (κ = 1/R) and ClausiusForm (S = βE), which are model choices, not derived facts. The theorem does not prove that any physical horizon actually satisfies those premises, nor does it prove the full Bekenstein bound for all states. Those remain open targets.
THEOREM deficitCost_pos_of_not_period · IndisputableMonolith/Holography/DeficitFreePeriod.lean
/-- Strict positivity off the closure lattice: any phase deficit not a whole number
of turns costs strictly positive recognition (accepted derive step
`derive_20260702_090702`). -/
theorem deficitCost_pos_of_not_period (δ : ℝ)
(h : ¬∃ n : ℤ, δ = (n : ℝ) * (2 * Real.pi)) :
0 < deficitCost δ := by
rcases lt_or_eq_of_le (deficitCost_nonneg δ) with hpos | heq
· exact hpos
· exact absurd ((deficitCost_eq_zero_iff δ).mp heq.symm) h
THEOREM deficitCost_eq_zero_iff · IndisputableMonolith/Holography/DeficitFreePeriod.lean
/-- The zero set of the deficit cost is EXACTLY the lattice `2πℤ`: perfect closure
happens at integer numbers of full turns and nowhere else. -/
theorem deficitCost_eq_zero_iff (δ : ℝ) :
deficitCost δ = 0 ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, δ = (n : ℝ) * (2 * Real.pi) := by
unfold deficitCost
constructor
· intro h
have hcos : Real.cos δ = 1 := by linarith
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := (Real.cos_eq_one_iff δ).mp hcos
exact ⟨n, hn.symm⟩
· rintro ⟨n, rfl⟩
have := Real.cos_int_mul_two_pi n
linarith
THEOREM euclideanPeriod_isLeast · IndisputableMonolith/Holography/DeficitFreePeriod.lean
/-- **The headline (LEG-B `legb_minimal_positive_period`, landed canonically).**
For `κ > 0`, the set of positive deficit-free return times has least element
`β = 2π/κ`. 2π is forced: it is the smallest positive zero of the deficit-cost
functional, which is itself the J-form on the forced U(1) carrier. -/
theorem euclideanPeriod_isLeast (kappa : ℝ) (hk : 0 < kappa) :
IsLeast {T : ℝ | 0 < T ∧ deficitCost (kappa * T) = 0} (euclideanPeriod kappa) := by
constructor
· refine ⟨div_pos (by positivity) hk, ?_⟩
rw [deficitCost_eq_zero_iff]
refine ⟨1, ?_⟩
unfold euclideanPeriod
push_cast
field_simp
· rintro T ⟨hT, hzero⟩
rw [deficitCost_eq_zero_iff] at hzero
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := hzero
have h2pi : (0 : ℝ) < 2 * Real.pi := by positivity
have hnR : (0 : ℝ) < (n : ℝ) := by
have hprod : (0 : ℝ) < (n : ℝ) * (2 * Real.pi) := hn ▸ mul_pos hk hT
nlinarith
have hnZ : (1 : ℤ) ≤ n := by exact_mod_cast Int.cast_pos.mp hnR
have hn1 : (1 : ℝ) ≤ (n : ℝ) := by exact_mod_cast hnZ
have hT_eq : T = (n : ℝ) * (2 * Real.pi) / kappa :=
eq_div_of_mul_eq (ne_of_gt hk) (by linarith [hn])
unfold euclideanPeriod
rw [hT_eq]
have hnum : 2 * Real.pi ≤ (n : ℝ) * (2 * Real.pi) := by
nlinarith [Real.pi_pos]
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, div_eq_mul_inv]
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right hnum (inv_nonneg.mpr hk.le)
THEOREM bekenstein_saturation_from_deficit_free_period · IndisputableMonolith/Holography/DeficitFreePeriod.lean
/-- **CONDITIONAL bridge.** Given the two named MODEL premises (`HorizonRate`:
`κ = 1/R`; `ClausiusForm`: `S = βE` at the deficit-free Euclidean period
`β = 2π/κ`), the entropy of the static horizon is exactly `S = 2πER`: the
SATURATING value of the Bekenstein/Casini form. Canonical form of the banked
`legb_clausius_to_bekenstein`. -/
theorem bekenstein_saturation_from_deficit_free_period
(S E R kappa : ℝ) (hR : 0 < R)
(hRate : HorizonRate kappa R)
(hClausius : ClausiusForm S E (euclideanPeriod kappa)) :
S = 2 * Real.pi * E * R := by
unfold HorizonRate at hRate
unfold ClausiusForm euclideanPeriod at hClausius
subst hRate
rw [hClausius]
have hR' : R ≠ 0 := ne_of_gt hR
field_simp
What this page does not claim
The theorem does not prove that any physical horizon satisfies the HorizonRate or ClausiusForm premises. The theorem does not prove the full Bekenstein bound for all states, only the saturating case under the two model premises. The theorem does not derive the value of 2π from first principles; it takes it as the smallest positive zero of the cost function.
Verify this page
Every tagged claim above names its theorem. To check one yourself rather than trust this page, elaborate the source module with Lean 4 and audit its axiom basis:
$ lake env lean IndisputableMonolith/Holography/DeficitFreePeriod.lean
expected axiom basis: [propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound] (the Lean kernel's standard three; no RS-specific axioms)
A page whose claims cannot be reproduced this way does not ship. In production, every anchor links to the exact declaration in the public source release, and this block carries the build receipt for the page itself.
Derived articles
This page is generated by a question-recursion engine: the questions its answers raise become the next pages. The current agenda, with open targets marked red:
- What physical process, if any, satisfies the HorizonRate premise κ = 1/R?
- Can the ClausiusForm premise S = βE be derived from a unique KMS analytic window?
- Does the full Bekenstein bound for all states follow from the deficit-free period, or only the saturating case?
- How does the deficit cost relate to the general J-cost function on other carriers?
- What is the status of the Live Bet 2 audit on the kernel-derivability of R = 2GE?
MACHINE LAYER · GROUNDED CLAIM TABLE · CLICK TO EXPAND
THEOREM deficitCost_pos_of_not_period · IndisputableMonolith/Holography/DeficitFreePeriod.lean
/-- Strict positivity off the closure lattice: any phase deficit not a whole number of turns costs strictly positive recognition (accepted derive step `derive_20260702_090702`). -/ theorem deficitCost_pos_of_not_period (δ : ℝ) (h : ¬∃ n : ℤ, δ = (n : ℝ) * (2 * Real.pi)) : 0 < deficitCost δ := by rcases lt_or_eq_of_le (deficitCost_nonneg δ) with hpos | heq · exact hpos · exact absurd ((deficitCost_eq_zero_iff δ).mp heq.symm) hIf a phase deficit δ is not an integer multiple of 2π, then the cost is strictly positive. deficitCost_pos_of_not_period · IndisputableMonolith/Holography/DeficitFreePeriod.leanTHEOREM deficitCost_eq_zero_iff · IndisputableMonolith/Holography/DeficitFreePeriod.lean
/-- The zero set of the deficit cost is EXACTLY the lattice `2πℤ`: perfect closure happens at integer numbers of full turns and nowhere else. -/ theorem deficitCost_eq_zero_iff (δ : ℝ) : deficitCost δ = 0 ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, δ = (n : ℝ) * (2 * Real.pi) := by unfold deficitCost constructor · intro h have hcos : Real.cos δ = 1 := by linarith obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := (Real.cos_eq_one_iff δ).mp hcos exact ⟨n, hn.symm⟩ · rintro ⟨n, rfl⟩ have := Real.cos_int_mul_two_pi n linarithThe cost vanishes if and only if δ is an integer multiple of 2π. deficitCost_eq_zero_iff · IndisputableMonolith/Holography/DeficitFreePeriod.leanTHEOREM euclideanPeriod_isLeast · IndisputableMonolith/Holography/DeficitFreePeriod.lean
/-- **The headline (LEG-B `legb_minimal_positive_period`, landed canonically).** For `κ > 0`, the set of positive deficit-free return times has least element `β = 2π/κ`. 2π is forced: it is the smallest positive zero of the deficit-cost functional, which is itself the J-form on the forced U(1) carrier. -/ theorem euclideanPeriod_isLeast (kappa : ℝ) (hk : 0 < kappa) : IsLeast {T : ℝ | 0 < T ∧ deficitCost (kappa * T) = 0} (euclideanPeriod kappa) := by constructor · refine ⟨div_pos (by positivity) hk, ?_⟩ rw [deficitCost_eq_zero_iff] refine ⟨1, ?_⟩ unfold euclideanPeriod push_cast field_simp · rintro T ⟨hT, hzero⟩ rw [deficitCost_eq_zero_iff] at hzero obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := hzero have h2pi : (0 : ℝ) < 2 * Real.pi := by positivity have hnR : (0 : ℝ) < (n : ℝ) := by have hprod : (0 : ℝ) < (n : ℝ) * (2 * Real.pi) := hn ▸ mul_pos hk hT nlinarith have hnZ : (1 : ℤ) ≤ n := by exact_mod_cast Int.cast_pos.mp hnR have hn1 : (1 : ℝ) ≤ (n : ℝ) := by exact_mod_cast hnZ have hT_eq : T = (n : ℝ) * (2 * Real.pi) / kappa := eq_div_of_mul_eq (ne_of_gt hk) (by linarith [hn]) unfold euclideanPeriod rw [hT_eq] have hnum : 2 * Real.pi ≤ (n : ℝ) * (2 * Real.pi) := by nlinarith [Real.pi_pos] rw [div_eq_mul_inv, div_eq_mul_inv] exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right hnum (inv_nonneg.mpr hk.le)The set of positive times with zero cost has a least element, namely 2π/κ. euclideanPeriod_isLeast · IndisputableMonolith/Holography/DeficitFreePeriod.leanTHEOREM bekenstein_saturation_from_deficit_free_period · IndisputableMonolith/Holography/DeficitFreePeriod.lean
/-- **CONDITIONAL bridge.** Given the two named MODEL premises (`HorizonRate`: `κ = 1/R`; `ClausiusForm`: `S = βE` at the deficit-free Euclidean period `β = 2π/κ`), the entropy of the static horizon is exactly `S = 2πER`: the SATURATING value of the Bekenstein/Casini form. Canonical form of the banked `legb_clausius_to_bekenstein`. -/ theorem bekenstein_saturation_from_deficit_free_period (S E R kappa : ℝ) (hR : 0 < R) (hRate : HorizonRate kappa R) (hClausius : ClausiusForm S E (euclideanPeriod kappa)) : S = 2 * Real.pi * E * R := by unfold HorizonRate at hRate unfold ClausiusForm euclideanPeriod at hClausius subst hRate rw [hClausius] have hR' : R ≠ 0 := ne_of_gt hR field_simpWith two named model premises, the deficit-free period forces the saturating value S = 2πER for horizon entropy. bekenstein_saturation_from_deficit_free_period · IndisputableMonolith/Holography/DeficitFreePeriod.lean