Encyclopedia Gravity Gravity Analysis Regge Bloch Fold4 D Transported Slot Term Axis Seed Masks
ARTICLE 2 claims 2 theorems
Gravity Analysis Regge Bloch Fold4 D Transported Slot Term Axis Seed Masks
A machine-checked library proves that a specific gravity-related term, the transported slot term, is exactly zero for certain difference masks, and this is a structural statement, not a physical claim.
The transported slot term
In the Recognition Science framework's machine-checked library of formal theorems, the declaration transportedSlotTerm_axis_seedMasks establishes a precise algebraic fact about a term that appears in a four-dimensional gravity analysis. The term itself, the transported slot term, is a component of a larger sum, called the Bloch fold, which is built from a discrete grid of points, each carrying a phase factor. The declaration proves that for two specific difference masks, labeled (1,2) and (2,1), the contributions from this term to the axis-TT class are identically zero for every wave vector. In plain language, it shows that certain geometric configurations contribute nothing to this particular part of the calculation.
This is a theorem, meaning it is a proved statement within the framework's formal system, with no unproved assumptions beyond the standard axioms of the underlying logic. The proof is a structural one: the area supports of the masks miss the axis-TT class loads entirely, so the contribution vanishes. The declaration is part of a larger campaign to build a phase-decorated fold for a specific type of triangle hinge in one Kuhn cell, using a particular midpoint plane-wave convention. The result is one of several consistency gates in that campaign, checking that the transported fold behaves as expected.
What the declaration does not claim is as important as what it does. It does not evaluate the mass-squared Taylor coefficient against the Einstein-Hilbert or TT continuum symbol; that is explicitly left for a later step. It does not prove that the Recognition Science sum converges to the Einstein-Hilbert action in four dimensions, and it does not establish any physical recovery of a gap. The theorem is a piece of internal algebraic consistency, not a physical law. It says nothing about whether the framework's gravity model is correct; it only certifies that this particular formal construction is internally coherent.
THEOREM blochFold11 · IndisputableMonolith/Gravity/Analysis/ReggeBlochFold4D.lean
/-- Honest transported finite-momentum `(1,1)` Bloch fold (72 instances). -/
def blochFold11 (H : Mat4) (m : Fin 4 → ℝ) : ℝ :=
∑ s : Fin 24, ∑ t : Fin 10, transportedSlotTerm H m s t
THEOREM blochFold11 · IndisputableMonolith/Gravity/Analysis/ReggeBlochFold4D.lean
/-- Honest transported finite-momentum `(1,1)` Bloch fold (72 instances). -/
def blochFold11 (H : Mat4) (m : Fin 4 → ℝ) : ℝ :=
∑ s : Fin 24, ∑ t : Fin 10, transportedSlotTerm H m s t
What this page does not claim
This does not prove S_RS_converges_EH_4d. This does not flip gap_action_recovery. This does not claim any physical significance for the vanishing contributions.
Verify this page
Every tagged claim above names its theorem. To check one yourself rather than trust this page, elaborate the source module with Lean 4 and audit its axiom basis:
$ lake env lean IndisputableMonolith/Gravity/Analysis/ReggeBlochFold4D.lean
expected axiom basis: [propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound] (the Lean kernel's standard three; no RS-specific axioms)
A page whose claims cannot be reproduced this way does not ship. In production, every anchor links to the exact declaration in the public source release, and this block carries the build receipt for the page itself.
Derived articles
This page is generated by a question-recursion engine: the questions its answers raise become the next pages. The current agenda, with open targets marked red:
- What does the mass-squared Taylor coefficient evaluate to against the Einstein-Hilbert symbol?
- Does the full Bloch fold converge to the Einstein-Hilbert action in four dimensions?
- What is the physical interpretation of the axis-TT class in the Recognition Science gravity model?
MACHINE LAYER · GROUNDED CLAIM TABLE · CLICK TO EXPAND
THEOREM blochFold11 · IndisputableMonolith/Gravity/Analysis/ReggeBlochFold4D.lean
/-- Honest transported finite-momentum `(1,1)` Bloch fold (72 instances). -/ def blochFold11 (H : Mat4) (m : Fin 4 → ℝ) : ℝ := ∑ s : Fin 24, ∑ t : Fin 10, transportedSlotTerm H m s tThe declaration proves that for difference masks (1,2) and (2,1), the transported slot term contributes identically zero to the axis-TT class for every wave vector. blochFold11 · IndisputableMonolith/Gravity/Analysis/ReggeBlochFold4D.leanTHEOREM blochFold11 · IndisputableMonolith/Gravity/Analysis/ReggeBlochFold4D.lean
/-- Honest transported finite-momentum `(1,1)` Bloch fold (72 instances). -/ def blochFold11 (H : Mat4) (m : Fin 4 → ℝ) : ℝ := ∑ s : Fin 24, ∑ t : Fin 10, transportedSlotTerm H m s tThe declaration does not evaluate the mass-squared Taylor coefficient against the Einstein-Hilbert or TT continuum symbol. blochFold11 · IndisputableMonolith/Gravity/Analysis/ReggeBlochFold4D.lean