Encyclopedia Foundation Foundation Pair Kernel Exact Jnonlinear Gauss S13
ARTICLE 4 claims 4 theorems
Foundation Pair Kernel Exact Jnonlinear Gauss S13
A discrete ledger of recognition events gives rise to a nonlinear version of Gauss's law, where the response to a source is exactly solvable.
The exact nonlinear Gauss law
Gauss's law in classical physics relates a field to the sources that produce it: the more charge inside a surface, the stronger the field flowing out. This framework builds the discrete analogue on a ledger, a finite record of events linked by weighted connections. The field values live on the ledger's nodes, and the law is not the usual linear one but a nonlinear version in which the flux across an edge grows with the hyperbolic sine of the field difference, not with the difference itself.
The action being studied is a sum over edges of cosh(field_i - field_j) - 1, a cost that is zero when the field is constant and grows steeply as differences increase. Taking the first variation of this action gives the flux: each edge contributes weight times sinh(field_i - field_j). The nonlinear Gauss equation states that twice the divergence of this flux equals a coupling constant times the source at each node. A theorem in the machine-checked library proves that a field satisfies this nonlinear equation if and only if it is a stationary point of the action under all variations, so the Gauss law is exactly the condition for the field to be a critical point of the cost.
Around a fixed background field, the action is locally quadratic, and the Hessian defines a tangent graph with edge weights weight times cosh(background_i - background_j). This tangent graph is symmetric and nonnegative, so small perturbations behave like a linear system. At zero background, the tangent graph is the original graph, recovering the standard linear response. With a constant native curvature cosh(ε₀) = 1 + hbar, the response scale becomes q divided by 2(1 + hbar), a factor that the framework identifies with its fundamental constant hbar. The framework proves that this constant-curvature tangent model satisfies the scaled source equation, and that the resulting Green field attaches correctly to a posting event on a three-dimensional torus.
In plain language, the framework shows that the nonlinear cost function has a well-behaved local approximation: near any background, perturbations respond linearly, and the response scale is controlled by the curvature. The exact nonlinear law itself is not solved in closed form, but the tangent structure is fully analyzed. The framework models this as a discrete Gauss law for recognition events, with the constant hbar entering as the native curvature scale. This is a definitional choice within the framework, not a derivation from external physics.
THEOREM exactJStationaryAtSource_iff_gauss · IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/PairKernelExactJNonlinearGaussS13.lean
/-- Exact action stationarity is equivalent to the pointwise nonlinear Gauss
equation. No source scale is selected by the equivalence. -/
theorem exactJStationaryAtSource_iff_gauss
{n : ℕ}
(G : WeightedLedgerGraph n)
(field source : Fin n → ℝ)
(coupling : ℝ) :
ExactJStationaryAtSource G field source coupling ↔
ExactJNonlinearGaussEquation G field source coupling := by
classical
constructor
· intro h i
have hi := h (fun j => if j = i then (1 : ℝ) else 0)
rw [exactJFirstVariationPairing_eq_two_sum_mul_laplacian] at hi
simpa [ExactJNonlinearGaussEquation] using hi
· intro h variation
rw [exactJFirstVariationPairing_eq_two_sum_mul_laplacian]
unfold ExactJNonlinearGaussEquation at h
calc
2 * ∑ i,
variation i * exactJNonlinearLaplacian G field i
=
∑ i,
variation i *
(2 * exactJNonlinearLaplacian G field i) := by
rw [Finset.mul_sum]
apply Finset.sum_congr rfl
intro i _
ring
_ = ∑ i,
variation i * (coupling * source i) := by
apply Finset.sum_congr rfl
intro i _
rw [h i]
_ = coupling * ∑ i, variation i * source i := by
rw [Finset.mul_sum]
apply Finset.sum_congr rfl
intro i _
ring
THEOREM exactJTangentGraph · IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/PairKernelExactJNonlinearGaussS13.lean
/-- Hessian graph of exact J at a background field. -/
def exactJTangentGraph
{n : ℕ}
(G : WeightedLedgerGraph n)
(background : Fin n → ℝ) :
WeightedLedgerGraph n where
weight i j :=
G.weight i j *
Real.cosh (background i - background j)
weight_nonneg i j :=
mul_nonneg (G.weight_nonneg i j)
(le_of_lt (Real.cosh_pos _))
weight_symm := by
intro i j
rw [G.weight_symm, ← Real.cosh_neg]
congr 2
ring
THEOREM exactJTangentGraph_zero_weight · IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/PairKernelExactJNonlinearGaussS13.lean
theorem exactJTangentGraph_zero_weight
{n : ℕ}
(G : WeightedLedgerGraph n)
(i j : Fin n) :
(exactJTangentGraph G (fun _ => 0)).weight i j =
G.weight i j := by
simp [exactJTangentGraph]
THEOREM nativeCurvatureTangentGreenScale · IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/PairKernelExactJNonlinearGaussS13.lean
theorem nativeCurvatureTangentGreenScale :
realGreenScaleFromPostingMagnitude
(nativeOrderedExactJSource /
(1 + Constants.hbar)) =
nativeExactJConjugateSource /
(1 + Constants.hbar) := by
rw [tangentGreenScale_eq
(1 + Constants.hbar) nativeOrderedExactJSource
(ne_of_gt nativeCurvature_pos)]
unfold nativeOrderedExactJSource
field_simp [ne_of_gt nativeCurvature_pos]
What this page does not claim
The framework does not assert that the constant-curvature graph is realized by a global native-drop background. The framework does not derive the value of hbar from first principles; it takes it as a constant of the framework. The nonlinear Gauss law is not solved in closed form; only the tangent (linearized) structure is analyzed.
Verify this page
Every tagged claim above names its theorem. To check one yourself rather than trust this page, elaborate the source module with Lean 4 and audit its axiom basis:
$ lake env lean IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/PairKernelExactJNonlinearGaussS13.lean
expected axiom basis: [propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound] (the Lean kernel's standard three; no RS-specific axioms)
A page whose claims cannot be reproduced this way does not ship. In production, every anchor links to the exact declaration in the public source release, and this block carries the build receipt for the page itself.
Derived articles
This page is generated by a question-recursion engine: the questions its answers raise become the next pages. The current agenda, with open targets marked red:
- How does the nonlinear Gauss law relate to the linear Gauss law of classical electrodynamics?
- What is the physical interpretation of the constant native curvature 1 + hbar?
- Can the exact nonlinear Gauss equation be solved in closed form for nontrivial backgrounds?
- How does the tangent response scale with the coupling constant q in the linear regime?
MACHINE LAYER · GROUNDED CLAIM TABLE · CLICK TO EXPAND
THEOREM exactJStationaryAtSource_iff_gauss · IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/PairKernelExactJNonlinearGaussS13.lean
/-- Exact action stationarity is equivalent to the pointwise nonlinear Gauss equation. No source scale is selected by the equivalence. -/ theorem exactJStationaryAtSource_iff_gauss {n : ℕ} (G : WeightedLedgerGraph n) (field source : Fin n → ℝ) (coupling : ℝ) : ExactJStationaryAtSource G field source coupling ↔ ExactJNonlinearGaussEquation G field source coupling := by classical constructor · intro h i have hi := h (fun j => if j = i then (1 : ℝ) else 0) rw [exactJFirstVariationPairing_eq_two_sum_mul_laplacian] at hi simpa [ExactJNonlinearGaussEquation] using hi · intro h variation rw [exactJFirstVariationPairing_eq_two_sum_mul_laplacian] unfold ExactJNonlinearGaussEquation at h calc 2 * ∑ i, variation i * exactJNonlinearLaplacian G field i = ∑ i, variation i * (2 * exactJNonlinearLaplacian G field i) := by rw [Finset.mul_sum] apply Finset.sum_congr rfl intro i _ ring _ = ∑ i, variation i * (coupling * source i) := by apply Finset.sum_congr rfl intro i _ rw [h i] _ = coupling * ∑ i, variation i * source i := by rw [Finset.mul_sum] apply Finset.sum_congr rfl intro i _ ringA field satisfies the nonlinear Gauss equation if and only if it is a stationary point of the action under all variations. exactJStationaryAtSource_iff_gauss · IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/PairKernelExactJNonlinearGaussS13.leanTHEOREM exactJTangentGraph · IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/PairKernelExactJNonlinearGaussS13.lean
/-- Hessian graph of exact J at a background field. -/ def exactJTangentGraph {n : ℕ} (G : WeightedLedgerGraph n) (background : Fin n → ℝ) : WeightedLedgerGraph n where weight i j := G.weight i j * Real.cosh (background i - background j) weight_nonneg i j := mul_nonneg (G.weight_nonneg i j) (le_of_lt (Real.cosh_pos _)) weight_symm := by intro i j rw [G.weight_symm, ← Real.cosh_neg] congr 2 ringThe tangent graph at a background has weights weight times cosh(background_i - background_j), hence is symmetric and nonnegative. exactJTangentGraph · IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/PairKernelExactJNonlinearGaussS13.leanTHEOREM exactJTangentGraph_zero_weight · IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/PairKernelExactJNonlinearGaussS13.lean
theorem exactJTangentGraph_zero_weight {n : ℕ} (G : WeightedLedgerGraph n) (i j : Fin n) : (exactJTangentGraph G (fun _ => 0)).weight i j = G.weight i j := by simp [exactJTangentGraph]At zero background the tangent graph is the original graph, recovering the standard linear response. exactJTangentGraph_zero_weight · IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/PairKernelExactJNonlinearGaussS13.leanTHEOREM nativeCurvatureTangentGreenScale · IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/PairKernelExactJNonlinearGaussS13.lean
theorem nativeCurvatureTangentGreenScale : realGreenScaleFromPostingMagnitude (nativeOrderedExactJSource / (1 + Constants.hbar)) = nativeExactJConjugateSource / (1 + Constants.hbar) := by rw [tangentGreenScale_eq (1 + Constants.hbar) nativeOrderedExactJSource (ne_of_gt nativeCurvature_pos)] unfold nativeOrderedExactJSource field_simp [ne_of_gt nativeCurvature_pos]With a constant native curvature cosh(ε₀) = 1 + hbar, the response scale becomes q divided by 2(1 + hbar). nativeCurvatureTangentGreenScale · IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/PairKernelExactJNonlinearGaussS13.lean