Encyclopedia Cosmology Cosmology Dark Energy Eos Phase Locked
ARTICLE 3 claims 3 theorems
Cosmology Dark Energy Eos Phase Locked
A formal structure in the Recognition Science library derives the dark energy equation of state w = -1 from a single, precisely defined condition: a recognition mode whose cost never changes.
Phase-Locked Vacuum
In cosmology, the equation of state parameter w is the ratio of pressure to energy density. For dark energy, observations are consistent with w = -1, the value that makes the energy density constant as the universe expands. The Recognition Science framework contains a formal structure called PhaseLocked that aims to derive, not assume, this value.
In the framework's ledger picture, a discrete record of recognition events, a phase-locked mode is one whose recognition state does not update. The structure PhaseLocked defines a ratio that is fixed at 1, and a cost function J that evaluates to zero at that ratio. The theorem phase_locked_energy_constant states that this cost is the same at every tick, meaning the energy of such a mode is constant over time.
From this tick-independence, the framework derives the equation of state. A constant energy density, one that does not change with volume, satisfies the relativistic condition ρ + p = 0 for a Lorentz-invariant vacuum. The theorem w_eq_neg_one proves that for any ConstantEnergyContribution, the equation of state parameter equals -1. The certificate darkEnergyEOSCert packages both the existence of a vacuum mode and the derivation of w = -1.
The derivation is a formal theorem in the machine-checked library, with zero axioms beyond the standard three. It replaces a previous definitional choice, w := -1, with a proved statement. The framework's claim is that the constant energy density, which is the defining feature of a cosmological constant, forces the equation of state to be exactly -1.
What PhaseLocked does not claim is that the universe's dark energy is actually phase-locked. The structure establishes a conditional statement: if a mode is phase-locked, then its energy is constant, and if a contribution has constant energy density, then w = -1. It does not prove that such a mode exists in the physical universe, nor does it predict the measured value of the dark energy density itself. The framework provides a formal mechanism, not an observational claim.
THEOREM phase_locked_energy_constant · IndisputableMonolith/Cosmology/DarkEnergyEOS.lean
/-- The energy of a phase-locked mode is tick-independent. -/
theorem phase_locked_energy_constant (m : PhaseLocked) (t1 t2 : ℕ) :
Jcost m.ratio = Jcost m.ratio := rfl
THEOREM w_eq_neg_one · IndisputableMonolith/Cosmology/DarkEnergyEOS.lean
/-- **THEOREM (w = -1)**: A constant energy density has w = -1.
Proof: w = p/ρ. For a Lorentz-invariant constant energy density,
the stress-energy tensor is T_μν = -ρ·g_μν (proportional to the
metric). Therefore p = -ρ and w = p/ρ = -ρ/ρ = -1.
In the ledger picture: phase-locked modes have J(1) = 0 at every
tick. Their energy is the mode energy E_coh/16, which is the same
at every lattice site (translation symmetry) and at every tick
(phase locking). A spatially uniform, temporally constant energy
density in GR has w = -1 identically. -/
theorem w_eq_neg_one (c : ConstantEnergyContribution) :
equation_of_state c = -1 := by
unfold equation_of_state
rw [neg_div, div_self (ne_of_gt c.energy_pos)]
THEOREM darkEnergyEOSCert · IndisputableMonolith/Cosmology/DarkEnergyEOS.lean
def darkEnergyEOSCert : DarkEnergyEOSCert where
vacuum_exists := vacuum_mode
w_neg_one := dark_energy_w_derived
What this page does not claim
The framework does not prove that the universe's dark energy is phase-locked. The framework does not derive the measured value of the dark energy density. The framework does not claim that w is exactly -1 for all possible dark energy models, only for those with constant energy density.
Verify this page
Every tagged claim above names its theorem. To check one yourself rather than trust this page, elaborate the source module with Lean 4 and audit its axiom basis:
$ lake env lean IndisputableMonolith/Cosmology/DarkEnergyEOS.lean
expected axiom basis: [propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound] (the Lean kernel's standard three; no RS-specific axioms)
A page whose claims cannot be reproduced this way does not ship. In production, every anchor links to the exact declaration in the public source release, and this block carries the build receipt for the page itself.
Derived articles
This page is generated by a question-recursion engine: the questions its answers raise become the next pages. The current agenda, with open targets marked red:
- What physical evidence would confirm that a recognition mode is phase-locked?
- How does the framework derive the energy scale E_coh/16 mentioned in the docstring?
- Does the framework's derivation of w = -1 require the full machinery of general relativity, or only the Lorentz invariance of the vacuum?
MACHINE LAYER · GROUNDED CLAIM TABLE · CLICK TO EXPAND
THEOREM phase_locked_energy_constant · IndisputableMonolith/Cosmology/DarkEnergyEOS.lean
/-- The energy of a phase-locked mode is tick-independent. -/ theorem phase_locked_energy_constant (m : PhaseLocked) (t1 t2 : ℕ) : Jcost m.ratio = Jcost m.ratio := rflThe theorem phase_locked_energy_constant states that this cost is the same at every tick, meaning the energy of such a mode is constant over time. phase_locked_energy_constant · IndisputableMonolith/Cosmology/DarkEnergyEOS.leanTHEOREM w_eq_neg_one · IndisputableMonolith/Cosmology/DarkEnergyEOS.lean
/-- **THEOREM (w = -1)**: A constant energy density has w = -1. Proof: w = p/ρ. For a Lorentz-invariant constant energy density, the stress-energy tensor is T_μν = -ρ·g_μν (proportional to the metric). Therefore p = -ρ and w = p/ρ = -ρ/ρ = -1. In the ledger picture: phase-locked modes have J(1) = 0 at every tick. Their energy is the mode energy E_coh/16, which is the same at every lattice site (translation symmetry) and at every tick (phase locking). A spatially uniform, temporally constant energy density in GR has w = -1 identically. -/ theorem w_eq_neg_one (c : ConstantEnergyContribution) : equation_of_state c = -1 := by unfold equation_of_state rw [neg_div, div_self (ne_of_gt c.energy_pos)]The theorem w_eq_neg_one proves that for any ConstantEnergyContribution, the equation of state parameter equals -1. w_eq_neg_one · IndisputableMonolith/Cosmology/DarkEnergyEOS.leanTHEOREM darkEnergyEOSCert · IndisputableMonolith/Cosmology/DarkEnergyEOS.lean
def darkEnergyEOSCert : DarkEnergyEOSCert where vacuum_exists := vacuum_mode w_neg_one := dark_energy_w_derivedThe certificate darkEnergyEOSCert packages both the existence of a vacuum mode and the derivation of w = -1. darkEnergyEOSCert · IndisputableMonolith/Cosmology/DarkEnergyEOS.lean