Encyclopedia Cosmology Cosmology Cmboptical Depth3 From Jcost Cmbopt Depth3 Cert
ARTICLE 3 claims 3 theorems
Cosmology Cmboptical Depth3 From Jcost Cmbopt Depth3 Cert
A machine-checked certificate proves three general properties of a cost function, but it does not by itself derive the cosmic microwave background's optical depth.
What the certificate proves
The cosmic microwave background (CMB) is the oldest light in the universe, released about 380,000 years after the Big Bang. Its optical depth measures how much that light was scattered by free electrons on its way to us; a value near zero means the early universe was mostly transparent. The Planck 2018 measurement gives an optical depth of about 0.054.
The declaration CMBOptDepth3Cert (a certificate: a packaged bundle of machine-checked proofs) establishes three facts about a cost function J. The cost function measures the penalty for recognizing one quantity as another; here it is applied to the ratio m/e of two real numbers. The certificate proves that this cost is zero when the two inputs are equal, that it is never negative when both inputs are positive, and that the quantity phi minus 1.5 is positive, where phi is the golden ratio, about 1.618. These are general facts about the cost function, not specific to cosmology.
In the Recognition Science framework, this certificate is a stepping stone. The framework's own research note records an intended application: setting the optical depth tau equal to J(phi)/2 gives about 0.059, which is within 10 percent of the Planck value. That numerical agreement is a research note, not a proved result. The certificate itself proves nothing about the CMB, because the quantities m and e are not defined in terms of cosmology; they are just placeholders.
What the certificate does establish is a reusable template. The same three facts are stated once, universally, in a shared module, and this certificate instantiates them. Any future work that defines m and e in physical terms can build on these proofs. Until then, the optical depth derivation remains a target, not a theorem.
THEOREM domainCost_at_eq · IndisputableMonolith/Cosmology/CMBOpticalDepth3FromJCost.lean
theorem domainCost_at_eq (r : ℝ) (h : r ≠ 0) : domainCost r r = 0 := by
unfold domainCost; rw [div_self h]; exact Jcost_unit0
THEOREM domainCost_nonneg · IndisputableMonolith/Cosmology/CMBOpticalDepth3FromJCost.lean
theorem domainCost_nonneg (m e : ℝ) (hm : 0 < m) (he : 0 < e) : 0 ≤ domainCost m e := by
unfold domainCost; exact Jcost_nonneg (div_pos hm he)
THEOREM canonicalThreshold_pos · IndisputableMonolith/Cosmology/CMBOpticalDepth3FromJCost.lean
theorem canonicalThreshold_pos : 0 < canonicalThreshold := by
unfold canonicalThreshold; linarith [phi_gt_onePointFive]
What this page does not claim
The certificate does not derive the optical depth of the CMB. The numerical agreement with Planck 2018 is a research note, not a proved result. The certificate does not define m and e in physical terms.
Verify this page
Every tagged claim above names its theorem. To check one yourself rather than trust this page, elaborate the source module with Lean 4 and audit its axiom basis:
$ lake env lean IndisputableMonolith/Cosmology/CMBOpticalDepth3FromJCost.lean
expected axiom basis: [propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound] (the Lean kernel's standard three; no RS-specific axioms)
A page whose claims cannot be reproduced this way does not ship. In production, every anchor links to the exact declaration in the public source release, and this block carries the build receipt for the page itself.
Derived articles
This page is generated by a question-recursion engine: the questions its answers raise become the next pages. The current agenda, with open targets marked red:
- How would one define the quantities m and e in terms of CMB physics to turn the certificate into a derivation of optical depth?
- What is the exact relationship between the cost function J and the optical depth tau that the research note intends?
- How does the framework's cost function connect to other cosmological parameters such as the baryon density or the Hubble constant?
MACHINE LAYER · GROUNDED CLAIM TABLE · CLICK TO EXPAND
THEOREM domainCost_at_eq · IndisputableMonolith/Cosmology/CMBOpticalDepth3FromJCost.lean
theorem domainCost_at_eq (r : ℝ) (h : r ≠ 0) : domainCost r r = 0 := by unfold domainCost; rw [div_self h]; exact Jcost_unit0The certificate proves that the cost is zero when the two inputs are equal. domainCost_at_eq · IndisputableMonolith/Cosmology/CMBOpticalDepth3FromJCost.leanTHEOREM domainCost_nonneg · IndisputableMonolith/Cosmology/CMBOpticalDepth3FromJCost.lean
theorem domainCost_nonneg (m e : ℝ) (hm : 0 < m) (he : 0 < e) : 0 ≤ domainCost m e := by unfold domainCost; exact Jcost_nonneg (div_pos hm he)The certificate proves that the cost is never negative when both inputs are positive. domainCost_nonneg · IndisputableMonolith/Cosmology/CMBOpticalDepth3FromJCost.leanTHEOREM canonicalThreshold_pos · IndisputableMonolith/Cosmology/CMBOpticalDepth3FromJCost.lean
theorem canonicalThreshold_pos : 0 < canonicalThreshold := by unfold canonicalThreshold; linarith [phi_gt_onePointFive]The certificate proves that phi minus 1.5 is positive. canonicalThreshold_pos · IndisputableMonolith/Cosmology/CMBOpticalDepth3FromJCost.lean