Encyclopedia Cosmology Cosmology Baryon Higher Order Correction Moves Toward Cmb
ARTICLE 3 claims 1 theorem 1 derived-unformalized
Cosmology Baryon Higher Order Correction Moves Toward Cmb
A framework's prediction for the universe's matter excess gets a small adjustment, and the adjustment points the right way.
The first correction
The baryon asymmetry is the observed excess of matter over antimatter in the universe, usually written as the ratio η_B of baryons to photons. The Planck 2018 measurement from the cosmic microwave background gives η_B = (6.104 ± 0.058) × 10⁻¹⁰. Within the Recognition Science framework, a leading-order prediction for this number is φ⁻⁴⁴ ≈ 6.376 × 10⁻¹⁰, which overshoots the measured value by about 4.5 percent.
The declaration correction_moves_toward_cmb proves a small formal fact: the first subleading correction to that prediction, written η_B^(1) = φ⁻⁴⁴ × (1 − φ⁻⁸), is strictly smaller than the leading term. The number φ⁻⁸ ≈ 0.9853 is called the washout factor. The corrected value lands near 6.28 × 10⁻¹⁰, roughly halving the gap to the CMB value. The theorem itself establishes only the inequality η_B_corrected < η_B_phi_scale; it does not assert that the corrected value equals the measured one.
In Recognition Science, the correction is not a free parameter. The framework derives φ⁻⁴⁴ and φ⁻⁸ from its forcing chain, so the corrected prediction is fixed once the leading term is accepted. The mechanism behind the washout is described as an eight-tick cycle during the electroweak phase transition, where each cycle reduces a defect by one rung. That mechanism is a hypothesis with a named falsifier: if precision measurements place η_B outside [6.0, 6.5] × 10⁻¹⁰ at more than 3σ, the corrected prediction is falsified.
What the theorem does not do is close the gap. The corrected value still differs from the Planck central value by more than the measurement error. The framework's library, a machine-checked collection of formal theorems, proves the inequality and the positivity of the correction factor, but it does not prove that the correction is the right size. The move toward the CMB value is a step in the right direction, not an arrival.
THEOREM correction_moves_toward_cmb · corrected_lt_leading · IndisputableMonolith/Cosmology/BaryonHigherOrder.lean
/-- The correction moves η_B in the right direction (toward the CMB value).
The CMB value 6.104 × 10⁻¹⁰ < 6.376 × 10⁻¹⁰ (leading term).
The corrected value is smaller than the leading term. -/
theorem correction_moves_toward_cmb :
eta_B_corrected < eta_B_phi_scale := corrected_lt_leading
/-- The corrected prediction is less than the leading term.
The 8-tick washout reduces η_B. -/
theorem corrected_lt_leading : eta_B_corrected < eta_B_phi_scale := by
unfold eta_B_corrected
have h1 : 0 < eta_B_phi_scale := eta_B_leading_pos
have h2 : correction_factor < 1 := correction_factor_lt_one
calc eta_B_phi_scale * correction_factor
< eta_B_phi_scale * 1 := by
apply mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h2 h1
_ = eta_B_phi_scale := mul_one _
DERIVED-UNFORMALIZED eta_B_corrected · IndisputableMonolith/Cosmology/BaryonHigherOrder.lean
/-- The first-order corrected baryon asymmetry. -/
noncomputable def eta_B_corrected : ℝ :=
eta_B_phi_scale * correction_factor
HYPOTHESIS baryon_correction_cert · IndisputableMonolith/Cosmology/BaryonHigherOrder.lean
/-- **THE BARYON CORRECTION THEOREM** (HYPOTHESIS):
The first-order 8-tick correction reduces η_B from φ⁻⁴⁴ to
φ⁻⁴⁴ × (1 − φ⁻⁸), roughly halving the 4.5% gap to the CMB value.
This is a HYPOTHESIS about the sphaleron washout mechanism. -/
theorem baryon_correction_cert : BaryonCorrectionCert where
leading := rfl
correction := rfl
corrected_def := rfl
correction_pos := correction_factor_pos
correction_lt_one := correction_factor_lt_one
corrected_smaller := corrected_lt_leading
corrected_pos := eta_B_corrected_pos
correction_rung := correction_term_rung
What this page does not claim
The corrected value equals the measured CMB value within error bars. The correction mechanism is a proved theorem rather than a hypothesis. The framework derives the fine-structure constant or any other coupling constant.
Verify this page
Every tagged claim above names its theorem. To check one yourself rather than trust this page, elaborate the source module with Lean 4 and audit its axiom basis:
$ lake env lean IndisputableMonolith/Cosmology/BaryonHigherOrder.lean
expected axiom basis: [propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound] (the Lean kernel's standard three; no RS-specific axioms)
A page whose claims cannot be reproduced this way does not ship. In production, every anchor links to the exact declaration in the public source release, and this block carries the build receipt for the page itself.
Derived articles
This page is generated by a question-recursion engine: the questions its answers raise become the next pages. The current agenda, with open targets marked red:
- What further corrections does the framework derive beyond the first-order term?
- Does the second-order correction continue to move the prediction toward the CMB value?
- What physical process in the framework sets the number of sphaleron cycles to φ⁸?
- How does the framework's prediction compare to other baryogenesis models?
MACHINE LAYER · GROUNDED CLAIM TABLE · CLICK TO EXPAND
THEOREM correction_moves_toward_cmb · corrected_lt_leading · IndisputableMonolith/Cosmology/BaryonHigherOrder.lean
/-- The correction moves η_B in the right direction (toward the CMB value). The CMB value 6.104 × 10⁻¹⁰ < 6.376 × 10⁻¹⁰ (leading term). The corrected value is smaller than the leading term. -/ theorem correction_moves_toward_cmb : eta_B_corrected < eta_B_phi_scale := corrected_lt_leading/-- The corrected prediction is less than the leading term. The 8-tick washout reduces η_B. -/ theorem corrected_lt_leading : eta_B_corrected < eta_B_phi_scale := by unfold eta_B_corrected have h1 : 0 < eta_B_phi_scale := eta_B_leading_pos have h2 : correction_factor < 1 := correction_factor_lt_one calc eta_B_phi_scale * correction_factor < eta_B_phi_scale * 1 := by apply mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h2 h1 _ = eta_B_phi_scale := mul_one _The declaration correction_moves_toward_cmb proves that the corrected prediction η_B^(1) = φ⁻⁴⁴ × (1 − φ⁻⁸) is strictly smaller than the leading term φ⁻⁴⁴. correction_moves_toward_cmb · corrected_lt_leading · IndisputableMonolith/Cosmology/BaryonHigherOrder.leanDERIVED-UNFORMALIZED eta_B_corrected · IndisputableMonolith/Cosmology/BaryonHigherOrder.lean
/-- The first-order corrected baryon asymmetry. -/ noncomputable def eta_B_corrected : ℝ := eta_B_phi_scale * correction_factorThe corrected prediction lands near 6.28 × 10⁻¹⁰, roughly halving the gap to the CMB value. eta_B_corrected · IndisputableMonolith/Cosmology/BaryonHigherOrder.leanHYPOTHESIS baryon_correction_cert · IndisputableMonolith/Cosmology/BaryonHigherOrder.lean
/-- **THE BARYON CORRECTION THEOREM** (HYPOTHESIS): The first-order 8-tick correction reduces η_B from φ⁻⁴⁴ to φ⁻⁴⁴ × (1 − φ⁻⁸), roughly halving the 4.5% gap to the CMB value. This is a HYPOTHESIS about the sphaleron washout mechanism. -/ theorem baryon_correction_cert : BaryonCorrectionCert where leading := rfl correction := rfl corrected_def := rfl correction_pos := correction_factor_pos correction_lt_one := correction_factor_lt_one corrected_smaller := corrected_lt_leading corrected_pos := eta_B_corrected_pos correction_rung := correction_term_rungThe washout mechanism is a hypothesis with a named falsifier: if precision measurements place η_B outside [6.0, 6.5] × 10⁻¹⁰ at more than 3σ, the corrected prediction is falsified. baryon_correction_cert · IndisputableMonolith/Cosmology/BaryonHigherOrder.lean