Encyclopedia Constants Constants Fermi Constant Score Card Row Fermi Pred Bracket
ARTICLE 4 claims 2 theorems 2 models
Constants Fermi Constant Score Card Row Fermi Pred Bracket
A machine-checked theorem places the Fermi constant, which sets the strength of the weak nuclear force, inside a narrow numerical window.
The Fermi bracket
The Fermi constant, usually written G_F, sets the strength of the weak nuclear force, the interaction responsible for radioactive beta decay. Its measured value, from the CODATA and Particle Data Group adjustments, is 1.1663787 x 10^-5 GeV^-2. The Recognition Science framework's machine-checked library of formal theorems proves a bracket around this number: the framework's predicted value lies strictly between 1.16 x 10^-5 and 1.17 x 10^-5 GeV^-2. The measured value sits inside that same bracket.
The prediction comes from a standard electroweak identity. In natural units, the Fermi constant equals 1 divided by the square root of 2 times the square of the Higgs vacuum expectation value, the energy scale at which the electroweak symmetry breaks. The framework uses the canonical display value of 246 GeV for that scale. The theorem row_fermi_pred_bracket proves the bracketing inequality directly from that definition, with no unproved axioms in the library's logic.
In Recognition Science, this is a partial result, not a full derivation. The 246 GeV value is a definitional choice, the canonical display value, not yet derived from the framework's deeper principles. The bracket is the theorem-grade slice; the bridge that would derive the 246 GeV scale from first principles remains open. The honest verdict is that the framework reproduces the measured Fermi constant to within about 0.6 percent, using a standard formula and a chosen input scale.
The row is labeled PARTIAL_THEOREM for that reason. A falsifier is named: if future measurements placed G_F outside the bracket, or if a future derivation of the vacuum expectation value failed to recover the 246 GeV scale, the prediction would fall. The framework claims the bracket, not the full story of where the scale comes from.
THEOREM row_fermi_pred_bracket · IndisputableMonolith/Constants/FermiConstantScoreCard.lean
theorem row_fermi_pred_bracket :
(1.16e-5 : ℝ) < row_fermi_pred ∧ row_fermi_pred < (1.17e-5 : ℝ) :=
⟨row_fermi_pred_lower, row_fermi_pred_upper⟩
THEOREM row_fermi_codata_in_bracket · IndisputableMonolith/Constants/FermiConstantScoreCard.lean
theorem row_fermi_codata_in_bracket :
(1.16e-5 : ℝ) < row_fermi_codata ∧ row_fermi_codata < (1.17e-5 : ℝ) := by
unfold row_fermi_codata
constructor <;> norm_num
MODEL row_fermi_pred_eq · IndisputableMonolith/Constants/FermiConstantScoreCard.lean
theorem row_fermi_pred_eq :
row_fermi_pred = 1 / (Real.sqrt 2 * vev_canonical ^ 2) := rfl
MODEL row_fermi_pred · IndisputableMonolith/Constants/FermiConstantScoreCard.lean
/-- P1-C01 Fermi constant prediction in GeV^-2 natural units. -/
noncomputable def row_fermi_pred : ℝ :=
1 / (Real.sqrt 2 * vev_canonical ^ 2)
What this page does not claim
No claim that the Fermi constant is derived from the framework's forcing chain. No claim that the 246 GeV scale is anything other than a definitional input. No claim about the value of G_F beyond the stated bracket.
Verify this page
Every tagged claim above names its theorem. To check one yourself rather than trust this page, elaborate the source module with Lean 4 and audit its axiom basis:
$ lake env lean IndisputableMonolith/Constants/FermiConstantScoreCard.lean
expected axiom basis: [propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound] (the Lean kernel's standard three; no RS-specific axioms)
A page whose claims cannot be reproduced this way does not ship. In production, every anchor links to the exact declaration in the public source release, and this block carries the build receipt for the page itself.
Derived articles
This page is generated by a question-recursion engine: the questions its answers raise become the next pages. The current agenda, with open targets marked red:
- What derivation would recover the canonical 246 GeV vacuum expectation value from first principles?
- How does the framework's electroweak VEV surface connect to its other derived constants?
- What is the next row in the Fermi constant score card?
- How does the 0.6 percent bracket compare with the precision of other framework predictions?
MACHINE LAYER · GROUNDED CLAIM TABLE · CLICK TO EXPAND
THEOREM row_fermi_pred_bracket · IndisputableMonolith/Constants/FermiConstantScoreCard.lean
theorem row_fermi_pred_bracket : (1.16e-5 : ℝ) < row_fermi_pred ∧ row_fermi_pred < (1.17e-5 : ℝ) := ⟨row_fermi_pred_lower, row_fermi_pred_upper⟩The framework's predicted value lies strictly between 1.16 x 10^-5 and 1.17 x 10^-5 GeV^-2. row_fermi_pred_bracket · IndisputableMonolith/Constants/FermiConstantScoreCard.leanTHEOREM row_fermi_codata_in_bracket · IndisputableMonolith/Constants/FermiConstantScoreCard.lean
theorem row_fermi_codata_in_bracket : (1.16e-5 : ℝ) < row_fermi_codata ∧ row_fermi_codata < (1.17e-5 : ℝ) := by unfold row_fermi_codata constructor <;> norm_numThe measured value sits inside that same bracket. row_fermi_codata_in_bracket · IndisputableMonolith/Constants/FermiConstantScoreCard.leanMODEL row_fermi_pred_eq · IndisputableMonolith/Constants/FermiConstantScoreCard.lean
theorem row_fermi_pred_eq : row_fermi_pred = 1 / (Real.sqrt 2 * vev_canonical ^ 2) := rflThe prediction comes from a standard electroweak identity. row_fermi_pred_eq · IndisputableMonolith/Constants/FermiConstantScoreCard.leanMODEL row_fermi_pred · IndisputableMonolith/Constants/FermiConstantScoreCard.lean
/-- P1-C01 Fermi constant prediction in GeV^-2 natural units. -/ noncomputable def row_fermi_pred : ℝ := 1 / (Real.sqrt 2 * vev_canonical ^ 2)The 246 GeV value is a definitional choice, the canonical display value, not yet derived from the framework's deeper principles. row_fermi_pred · IndisputableMonolith/Constants/FermiConstantScoreCard.lean