Encyclopedia Acoustics Acoustics Harmonic Distortion Rs Canonical Threshold
ARTICLE 3 claims 2 theorems 1 model
Acoustics Harmonic Distortion Rs Canonical Threshold
A machine-checked library defines a number meant to mark the edge of audible distortion, but proves only that the number is positive.
The audibility threshold
Harmonic distortion is the unwanted extra frequencies a loudspeaker or amplifier adds to a sound. Engineers measure it as a percentage of the total signal, and decades of listening tests place the threshold of audibility around 0.5 to 1 percent. A listener usually cannot hear distortion below that band, and can hear it clearly above it.
In Recognition Science, a ledger, a discrete record of recognition events, supplies a cost function that measures how far a ratio of two quantities is from unity. The framework's library, a machine-checked collection of formal theorems, defines a number called canonicalThreshold as phi minus 3/2, where phi is the golden ratio, about 1.618. The value is about 0.118, or 11.8 percent.
The library proves exactly one fact about this number: it is greater than zero. That is the entire content of the theorem attached to the definition. The library also proves that the underlying cost function vanishes when its two inputs are equal and is never negative for positive inputs. These are general properties of the cost function, not results specific to acoustics.
In Recognition Science, the number 11.8 percent is a candidate for an audibility threshold, but the framework does not claim it is the measured one. The research note in the source file records an intention: raising the cost to a power related to spatial dimension would bring it near 1.39 percent, closer to the conventional 1 percent figure. That calculation is a research note, not a proved result. The definition of the threshold does not connect the mass and energy variables in the cost function to any physical quantity in acoustics.
What the declaration does establish is a precise, named constant inside a formal system, with a proof that it is positive. What it does not establish is that this constant corresponds to any measurable property of sound. The gap is not a failure of the proof; it is a missing definition of what mass and energy mean for a loudspeaker. Until that definition exists, the threshold remains a number in search of a physical interpretation.
THEOREM canonicalThreshold_pos · IndisputableMonolith/Acoustics/Harmonic_Distortion_RS.lean
theorem canonicalThreshold_pos : 0 < canonicalThreshold := by
unfold canonicalThreshold; linarith [phi_gt_onePointFive]
THEOREM domainCost_at_eq · domainCost_nonneg · IndisputableMonolith/Acoustics/Harmonic_Distortion_RS.lean
theorem domainCost_at_eq (r : ℝ) (h : r ≠ 0) : domainCost r r = 0 := by
unfold domainCost; rw [div_self h]; exact Jcost_unit0
theorem domainCost_nonneg (m e : ℝ) (hm : 0 < m) (he : 0 < e) : 0 ≤ domainCost m e := by
unfold domainCost; exact Jcost_nonneg (div_pos hm he)
MODEL domainCost · IndisputableMonolith/Acoustics/Harmonic_Distortion_RS.lean
def domainCost (m e : ℝ) : ℝ := Jcost (m / e)
What this page does not claim
The canonicalThreshold is not claimed to match the measured audibility threshold of 0.5 to 1 percent. The framework does not claim that harmonic distortion is a recognition event in any physical sense. No theorem connects the canonicalThreshold to any specific acoustic measurement.
Verify this page
Every tagged claim above names its theorem. To check one yourself rather than trust this page, elaborate the source module with Lean 4 and audit its axiom basis:
$ lake env lean IndisputableMonolith/Acoustics/Harmonic_Distortion_RS.lean
expected axiom basis: [propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound] (the Lean kernel's standard three; no RS-specific axioms)
A page whose claims cannot be reproduced this way does not ship. In production, every anchor links to the exact declaration in the public source release, and this block carries the build receipt for the page itself.
Derived articles
This page is generated by a question-recursion engine: the questions its answers raise become the next pages. The current agenda, with open targets marked red:
- What physical definitions of mass and energy in an acoustic system would make the cost function a meaningful measure of distortion?
- Does the 1.39 percent figure, derived by raising the cost to a power, survive a formal proof?
- What listening-test methodology produced the conventional 0.5 to 1 percent audibility band?
MACHINE LAYER · GROUNDED CLAIM TABLE · CLICK TO EXPAND
THEOREM canonicalThreshold_pos · IndisputableMonolith/Acoustics/Harmonic_Distortion_RS.lean
theorem canonicalThreshold_pos : 0 < canonicalThreshold := by unfold canonicalThreshold; linarith [phi_gt_onePointFive]The library proves exactly one fact about this number: it is greater than zero. canonicalThreshold_pos · IndisputableMonolith/Acoustics/Harmonic_Distortion_RS.leanTHEOREM domainCost_at_eq · domainCost_nonneg · IndisputableMonolith/Acoustics/Harmonic_Distortion_RS.lean
theorem domainCost_at_eq (r : ℝ) (h : r ≠ 0) : domainCost r r = 0 := by unfold domainCost; rw [div_self h]; exact Jcost_unit0theorem domainCost_nonneg (m e : ℝ) (hm : 0 < m) (he : 0 < e) : 0 ≤ domainCost m e := by unfold domainCost; exact Jcost_nonneg (div_pos hm he)The library also proves that the underlying cost function vanishes when its two inputs are equal and is never negative for positive inputs. domainCost_at_eq · domainCost_nonneg · IndisputableMonolith/Acoustics/Harmonic_Distortion_RS.leanMODEL domainCost · IndisputableMonolith/Acoustics/Harmonic_Distortion_RS.lean
def domainCost (m e : ℝ) : ℝ := Jcost (m / e)The definition of the threshold does not connect the mass and energy variables in the cost function to any physical quantity in acoustics. domainCost · IndisputableMonolith/Acoustics/Harmonic_Distortion_RS.lean