FORMAL PROOFS

The Indisputable Chain

This page is the formal backbone of Recognition Physics: a single Lean proof chain from tautology to constants and laws.

Every step is machine-checkable. There are no adjustable parameters; the structure is over-constrained and falsifiable.

If it doesn't deliver, it fails immediately—there's nothing to tune.

What you're looking at

  • Source of truth: This Lean code is the authoritative definition. If narrative pages disagree with this, the code wins.
  • What's proven: Starting from "nothing cannot recognize itself" we derive a unique ledger, conservation laws, J(x), φ, 3D space, 8-tick cycles, and ultimately physical constants.
  • How it differs: Narrative pages explain conceptually. This proves mathematically. Every line here has been verified by Lean's proof assistant.
  • Falsifiability: The chain is over-constrained. Change any theorem and the rest breaks. One wrong prediction invalidates everything.

The deductive spine

T1 Ledger necessitystate accounting, conservation substrate
T2 Atomicityquantization, minimal tick/action
T3 Conservationcontinuity equations ∂tρ + ∇·J = 0
T4 Unique costleast-action, AM-GM bound
T5 k = 1, φscaling laws, RG fixed points
T6 d = 33D space, knot/topology constraints
T7 T = 2^Dminimal Hamiltonian/Gray traversal
T8 Causal cones, crelativistic causality

See detailed theorem pages →

Assumptions & scope

  • Axioms: Meta-Principle (nothing cannot recognize itself), Composability, Finiteness
  • Working assumption: Cubic tiling (explicitly stated, to be elevated to theorem)
  • What would falsify: Any dimensionless prediction disagreeing with measurement at stated precision

Papers & resources

Deep dive into the mathematical foundations and empirical validation:

Foundations Paper (PDF) Empirical Validation GitHub Repository

FAQ

Why Lean?

Lean is a theorem prover that guarantees correctness. Unlike hand-written proofs, Lean-verified proofs cannot contain logical errors. Every step is checked by machine.

Where are the assumptions?

All assumptions are explicit: Meta-Principle (logical necessity), Composability, Finiteness, and cubic tiling (working assumption). No hidden axioms.

What does parameter-free mean?

No adjustable numbers. Every constant (φ, α, masses) is derived from the axioms. Change nothing to fit data—the structure is rigid.

How is this different from MOND/dark matter?

MOND adds one parameter (a₀) empirically. Dark matter adds 5-6 parameters per galaxy. We derive the modification from first principles with zero free parameters.